commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [all] Rethinking dev@
Date Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:11:41 GMT
Agreed, I think multiple lists would be great for everyone else who is
not on the Commons PMC; in fact that was a major reason why Commons
RDF went to the Incubator first, to have its own mailing lists in the
constructive phase.

However it could be very fragmenting for the PMC as there's the danger
of developing the "Crypto PMC", "Math PMC" etc - effectively making an
Apache within Apache. We should not forget the Jakarta learning
either. Perhaps if all PMC members agree to stay on all of the
sub-lists, and all release votes are done on dev@commons, then it
could work well.





On 24 June 2016 at 11:00, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com> wrote:
> The 'problem of Jakarta' was a problem of supervision. The board could
> not trust that anyone was minding the entire store. Multiple mailing
> lists could be seen as an indication that commons is large and diverse
> enough to risk suffering from the same problem. Some would think that
> this desire to give it its own mailing list is a strong indication
> that it should be its own TLP. That being said, launching a mailing
> list just for the purpose of hashing out the future of Math might be a
> compromise.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message