commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [ALL] About binary compatibility
Date Mon, 13 Jun 2016 18:57:15 GMT
I'd rather not make it (the OSGi metadata) the "source of truth".

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:49 PM Thomas Vandahl <tv@apache.org> wrote:

> On 05.06.16 20:33, James Carman wrote:
> > Not quite. OSGi is a special case. It's much more restrictive than simple
> > J2SE, because it can be. In the general case, the public API for OSGi is
> > different from the public API for J2SE. Let's not confuse the two.
>
> My intention was to use the OSGi meta data to define something that we
> consider a public API. I agree to Sebastian that this might be difficult
> for some components as they were not designed with a separation of
> public and private API in mind. That's why I believe that suing
> something a little more restrictive may help us to move forward and
> improve the situation.
>
> Bye, Thomas.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message