commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jochen Wiedmann <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Brining clirr to the ASF?
Date Tue, 14 Jun 2016 06:39:48 GMT
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Gary Gregory <> wrote:

>> as Jochen has pointed out, Clirr seems to be unmaintained. However we build
>> a good part of our release strategy upon clirr. So I wonder whether we
>> should foster bringing clirr to the ASF (for example by going through
>> incubation). We're probably not the only ASF project using Clirr.
> +1. Can we bring in code that's under GNU Lesser General Public and make it
> ASL 2?
> Could fit under a new Commons Build or Clirr component since it is a
> "common" build requirement.

As Clirr is internally based on BCEL, I'd rather see us build a new
tool on top of ASM, which is very well maintained. Besides, that would
solve the license problem.


The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message