commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5
Date Sun, 19 Jun 2016 17:28:40 GMT
Hello Oliver,

Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de> schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016
um 18:00 Uhr:

>
>
> Am 19.06.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> > Hello Oliver,
> >
> > Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de> schrieb am So., 19. Juni
> 2016
> > um 17:43 Uhr:
> >
> >> Build works fine with Java 1.7 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look
> >> good (there are a number of PMD and findbugs warnings, but I think this
> >> is acceptable).
> >>
> >> However, I was not able to build the site locally because of:
> >>
> >> [ERROR] Could not find resource
> >>
> >>
> 'c:\data\dev\projects\OpenSource\bcel\bcel-6.0-src/findbugs-exclude-filter.xml'.
> >> -> [Help 1]
> >>
> >> This file is missing from the source distribution. This prevents me from
> >> voting +1.
> >>
> >> Note: I did a rather technical check of the artifacts and cannot judge
> >> if the content is really what the users desire.
> >>
> >
> > To make it easier for me to tally up votes in the end, does this mean
> your
> > vote is -1?
>
> I have an interest to see the release coming out, so it is a -0.
>

Thank you for the clarification.

We release sources, not websites. For this reason I do not consider this
blocking. I have fixed the problem in rev 1749187 [1]. So if there is
another RC it will be fixed. Let's see what others think.

Benedikt

[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1749187&view=rev


>
> Oliver
>
> >
> > Benedikt
> >
> >
> >> Thanks
> >> Oliver
> >>
> >> Am 18.06.2016 um 16:54 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> more then 10 years have passed since we've released BCEL 5.2. Users are
> >>> waiting for us to release a new version capable of handling Java 6, 7
> >> and 8
> >>> byte code. There have already been 4 release candidates for BCEL 6.0
> but
> >>> they have not made it for various reasons. Most importantly BC has been
> >>> broken. Package and Maven coordinates have been changed according to
> our
> >>> release guidelines. However our users have asked us to provide a binary
> >>> compatible release and here we are...
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on
> >> RC5.
> >>>
> >>> BCEL 6.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> >>>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel (rev 14039)
> >>>
> >>> The tag is here:
> >>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC5
> >> (rev
> >>> 1749058)
> >>>
> >>> Maven artifacts are here:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1177/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/
> >>>
> >>> These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes:
> >>>
> >>> bcel-6.0-javadoc.jar
> >>> (SHA1: 79b5fd315f5f949580268e55c0baa85e18df4740)
> >>> bcel-6.0-sources.jar
> >>> (SHA1: f4ab6e682465471084e601c49e03a1385c610343)
> >>> bcel-6.0-test-sources.jar
> >>> (SHA1: 9aabf73fd9680336000f54a29fc234eaf474fc85)
> >>> bcel-6.0-tests.jar
> >>> (SHA1: f34db9121dd7b2dd198754416d29258a96549789)
> >>> bcel-6.0.jar
> >>> (SHA1: e6546a05530e8ed64b07cb917a8dca7912a16404)
> >>> bcel-6.0.pom
> >>> (SHA1: 76c9509859b13c74ff082e489b247708c48e59cb)
> >>>
> >>> I have tested this with Java 7 and 8 using Maven 3.3.9 on Mac OS
> 10.11.5.
> >>>
> >>> Details of changes since 5.2 are in the release notes:
> >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >>>
> >>
> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/changes-report.html
> >>>
> >>> Site:
> >>>   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/
> >>> (note some *relative* links are broken and the 6.0 directories are not
> >> yet
> >>> created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)
> >>>
> >>> Clirr Report (compared to 5.2):
> >>>
> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/clirr-report.html
> >>>
> >>> Note that Clirr reports several errors. These have been discussed on
> the
> >> ML
> >>> already and I uploaded the site a while ago giving everybody the
> >>> opportunity to raise objections against these changes. These changes
> are
> >>> also explicitly noted in the Release notes.
> >>>
> >>> Furthermore java.io.Serializable has been dropped from all BCEL
> classes.
> >> An
> >>> extended Clirr report including this change can be reviewed here:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/bcel5-bcel6-clirr-report.html
> >>>
> >>> We don't consider this to be a problem because we don't see a reason
> for
> >>> users to serialize BCEL classes.
> >>>
> >>> RAT Report:
> >>>
> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/rat-report.html
> >>>
> >>> KEYS:
> >>>   https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> >>> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now,
> >>> i.e. sometime after 17:00 CEST 21-June 2016
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> >>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> >>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> >>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> Benedikt
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message