commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Roberts" <mar...@cs.washington.edu>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6
Date Mon, 20 Jun 2016 23:14:36 GMT
Sorry - I'm replying to my own post.  Is there any chance that there is a revision point in
the active tree that corresponds exactly to RC6 but without the path changes?  I could do
some testing on that.

Probably too much to hope for.

Thanks,
Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Roberts [mailto:markro@cs.washington.edu]
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 4:12 PM
> To: 'Commons Developers List'
> Cc: 'findbugs-discuss@cs.umd.edu'; 'findbugs-core@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6
> 
> Well I was clearly confused about this release.  It has reverted back to the old
> class hierarchy in the name of binary compatibility.  I can see now that that
> was the intention and it makes sense.  However, I cannot test it (and hence
> vote up or down) as I am certainly not going to edit all my sources back to the
> 'old' system.
> 
> So my question is what is the plan?  This release gets me no closer to a place
> where I can quit providing my own version of BCEL with our Daikon product.
> What is the plan for a release from the active tree with the new class
> hierarchy?
> 
> Thank you,
> Mark Roberts
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:britter@apache.org]
> > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 12:37 PM
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Cc: findbugs-discuss@cs.umd.edu; findbugs-core@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > after some build related problems with RC5, I'd like to call a vote to
> > release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6. The only changes
> > compared to
> > RC5 is a fix in the source assembly: It now includes all files
> > necessary to run a clean build.
> >
> > BCEL 6.0 RC6 is available for review here:
> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel (rev 14065)
> >
> > The tag is here:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_R
> > C6
> >  (rev 1749388)
> >
> > Maven artifacts are here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-
> > 1179/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/
> >
> > These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes:
> >
> > bcel-6.0-javadoc.jar
> > (SHA1: 89cf95656f0f8a93e77100c8d5811f7cd9af866b)
> > bcel-6.0-sources.jar
> > (SHA1: 162f96530e8935e8a71a9e6d5497026aa3bdc945)
> > bcel-6.0-test-sources.jar
> > (SHA1: 2b07be3a0a4560c9766d3261cd012cf636fe965a)
> > bcel-6.0-tests.jar
> > (SHA1: 9e825da46e0cd66f87ccd907a43c4e2ebd15b8d6)
> > bcel-6.0.jar
> > (SHA1: 09d0a4c32ba6c3c22f0680f89ceeaf3e677ac659)
> > bcel-6.0.pom
> > (SHA1: a5d48ac34909f3a0ac788d37835075be5c2bb9d7)
> >
> > I have tested this with Java 7 and 8 using Maven 3.3.9 on Mac OS 10.11.5.
> >
> > Details of changes since 5.2 are in the release notes:
> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-
> NOTES.txt
> >   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/changes-
> > report.html
> >
> > Site:
> >   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/
> > (note some *relative* links are broken and the 6.0 directories are not
> > yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)
> >
> > Clirr Report (compared to 5.2):
> >
> > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/clirr-report.html
> >
> > Note that Clirr reports several errors. These have been discussed on
> > the ML already and I uploaded the site a while ago giving everybody
> > the opportunity to raise objections against these changes. These
> > changes are also explicitly noted in the Release notes.
> >
> > Furthermore java.io.Serializable has been dropped from all BCEL
> > classes. An extended Clirr report including this change can be reviewed
> here:
> >
> > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/bcel5-bcel6-clirr
> > -
> > report.html
> >
> > We don't consider this to be a problem because we don't see a reason
> > for users to serialize BCEL classes.
> >
> > RAT Report:
> >
> > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC6/rat-report.html
> >
> > KEYS:
> >   https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> >
> > Please review the release candidate and vote.
> > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. sometime
> > after
> > 22:00 CEST 23-June 2016
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> > [ ] +0 OK, but...
> > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >
> > We're almost there... :-)
> > Thanks!
> > Benedikt


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message