Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <573A14EC.2020002@apache.org>
References: <5733F8A2.9060308@apache.org>
	<pony-5c0191c5bda2836af1cb87878694cfbf1db676c8-228151d5712806a4100c11addd00f3559f24a6ec@dev.commons.apache.org>
	<573A14EC.2020002@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 21:51:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGHyZ6Kk2JQ9kVyhEg6iFj2XczNpPCGDoy6Z6eJ1BmF4N=-+dA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc2
From: Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133ac901f00ce0533169db5
archived-at: Wed, 18 May 2016 04:51:47 -0000

--001a1133ac901f00ce0533169db5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Yes, that's correct.

I'm now +1 (non-binding)

-- 
Sean Busbey
On May 16, 2016 13:44, "Josh Elser" <elserj@apache.org> wrote:

> Sean,
>
> Circling back around on the discussions today about Jackrabbit's NOTICE
> file, this would change your -1 vote, yes?
>
> Sean Busbey wrote:
>
>> -1 (non-binding)
>>
>> bad:
>>
>> * LICENSE/NOTICE file is missing a bundled third party reference[1]
>>
>> maybe fine:
>>
>> * source artifacts mostly match source tag[2]
>> * build / test from source works[3]
>>
>> fine:
>> * verified signatures and checksums[4]
>>
>> [1]:
>>
>>
>> core/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/vfs2/provider/webdav/test/JcrUtils.java
>>
>> says it is copied from Apache Jackrabbit 2.4.0, which has a NOTICE.txt
>> file.
>>
>> there is no mention of this in the source repo NOTICE (I would presume the
>> related test jar would also be wrong).
>>
>> [2]:
>>
>> The source tag contains an additional module 'sandbox' that is not in the
>> source artifact.
>>
>> I am not sure if this is intentional, but it looks like it is.
>>
>> [3]:
>>
>> Related to [2], if you run `mvn verify` things are fine, but if you use
>> the sandbox profile,
>> via `mvn -Pinclude-sandbox verify`, things fall over because the above
>> mentioned module
>> is missing.
>>
>> [4]:
>>
>> everything properly checks out, but the format of the md5 file was
>> different for the artifacts in
>> dist.apache compared to repository.apache.
>>
>> On 2016-05-11 20:29, Josh Elser<elserj@apache.org>  wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Please consider the following for Apache Commons VFS2 version 2.1 (rc2).
>>>
>>> Maven repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1166
>>> Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/ r13608
>>>
>>> MD5  commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>> 8cc35a3169e1faee727c5af94c7dd904
>>> SHA1 commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>> 72b7557c4e8b1789b8aa0a9c1e0cb2c9daecec30
>>> MD5  commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-src.tar.gz
>>> a182ac642874e85fbc7d1086f7663482
>>> SHA1 commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-src.tar.gz
>>> e42ac2053deb314277213e43f6f1d6b43eff3de9
>>>
>>> MD5  commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-bin.zip
>>> b512a45c63d824eef826f174fd7a9245
>>> SHA1 commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-bin.zip
>>> 886cb5a430da58b3a68e2abf297b6f735d3ffaf0
>>> MD5  commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-src.zip
>>> 29645a0ad091c15b2cf76b619c33069f
>>> SHA1 commons-vfs-distribution-2.1-src.zip
>>> 5824cf4d802865b5e93ff62c90affa58df6c4384
>>>
>>> Signed with 4677D66C from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/KEYS
>>>
>>> SVN tag is available at
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/vfs/tags/commons-vfs2-project-2.1-rc2/
>>> r1743451
>>>
>>> Staged Maven website:
>>> http://home.apache.org/~elserj/commons/commons-vfs-2.1/
>>>
>>> All reports are available in the provided staged Maven site (see "Project
>>> Reports" at the root-level as well as under each sub-module).
>>> JIRA-generated
>>> release notes are available in the dist.a.o "Artifacts" repository. Unit
>>> tests pass and the RC was built util JDK6.
>>>
>>> (For Sebb) A direct Clirr link
>>>
>>> http://home.apache.org/~elserj/commons/commons-vfs-2.1/commons-vfs2/clirr-report.html
>>>
>>> Changes since rc1:
>>>
>>> * Fixed more compatibility concerns against 2.0 (thanks, Greg)
>>> * Improved release notes (thanks, Sebb)
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for 72-hours, 2016/05/14 0400 UTC.
>>>
>>>     [ ] +1 Release these artifacts as version 2.1
>>>     [ ] 0  OK, but...
>>>     [ ] -1 I oppose these artifacts as version 2.1 because..
>>>
>>> - Josh
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

--001a1133ac901f00ce0533169db5--