Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A977E200A01 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:25:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A8AC11609F4; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:25:58 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id F372F1609A9 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:25:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 68163 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2016 17:25:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 68150 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2016 17:25:56 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2016 17:25:56 +0000 Received: from hw10447.local (pool-173-67-37-67.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [173.67.37.67]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 7CC9B1A013B for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 17:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5728DF21.1080406@apache.org> Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 13:25:53 -0400 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0 References: <5726D778.8080701@apache.org> <5727559E.8070306@apache.org> <57275D6E.7030000@apache.org> <57276D01.4080507@apache.org> <5727F2B9.20007@apache.org> <5728DB1D.4000400@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Tue, 03 May 2016 17:25:58 -0000 sebb wrote: >>> >> Ideally the duplicate archives should be dropped, but that is not a >>> >> blocker, just a nuisance when reviewing. >> > >> > >> > Yeah, I'll try to figure out what's going on with that when I roll rc1. I'm >> > not sure since it's not pulling directly from the apache.pom (I'm not sure >> > what all the commons parent pom is doing yet). > > It would be a lot easier if VFS were a single module project. > Maven does not handle multi-module projects well. > For example I just tried "mvn site" in the RC directory and it > complained about not finding various bits of VFS in the repo. > This does not happen with single module projects. mvn site:stage is used expressly for this purpose. Maven has no problems with properly constructed multi-module projects -- it's a fallacy that Maven cannot handle multi-module projects well. However, fixing it is a separate topic than this RC voting :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org