commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc1
Date Thu, 05 May 2016 09:30:19 GMT
Test dependency should be fine. The SSHD and JSch integration is
however probably not OK without classification.


I think integrating with "encryption functionality" (without bundling)
is sufficient to become an "encryption item":

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201605.mbox/%3CD35026DE.692DB%25aharui%40adobe.com%3E

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/policy-guidance/encryption/identifying-encryption-items


Let's try to sort this in the separate thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201605.mbox/%3CCAB917R%2BuGHPiOUUq_F48n3-m-nKdgrgndcBkmpmA%3DS1H3Ngs5Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E

It could be that Apache's pages about this is out of date.

On 4 May 2016 at 18:50, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Stian,
>
> Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>
>
> [snip]
>
>> -1 Unclassified use of encryption libraries Bouncy Castle/Apache
>> Mina/SSHD/Hadoop/jsch/Jetty (plus some AES128 in DefaultCryptor) - but
>> Commons VFS is not classified on
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
>
>
> Sorry, but I fail to see the problem. BC is used as test dependency only and
> it is nowhere part of our deliveries or used in our code. AES128 is part of
> the Java runtime.
>
> Cheers,
> Jörg
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message