commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc1
Date Fri, 06 May 2016 00:48:17 GMT
If the RM is willing, there is always the RERO route and getting a 2.1.1
out next to address JRE/JVM compat. issues if those are fixable at all from
VFS in a not too hacky manner.

Gary
On May 5, 2016 5:41 PM, "Josh Elser" <elserj@apache.org> wrote:

> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>
>> >  Hi Josh,
>>> >
>>> >  Josh Elser wrote:
>>> >
>>>
>>>> >>  Oh, well then! No pressure:)
>>>> >>
>>>> >>  I'll have to find some time to re-read all of the conversation
>>>> between
>>>> >>  Jörg and Stian, but my initial reaction is the same as what you
were
>>>> >>  implying: compatibility across more JVMs would be great, but
>>>> shouldn't
>>>> >>  block this 2.1 release.
>>>>
>>>
>> Just an additional remark: Compatibility across more JVMs*is*  an issue,
>> since there are platforms where you have no other choice (IBM AIX, Mac,
>> most
>> Linux distributions use OpenJDK by default).
>>
>>
> Is 2.1's compatibility across JVMs worse than 2.0's was? What are the
> guarantees put forth by those involved with commons-vfs for compatibility
> WRT JVMs?
>
> I'm not nit-picking JVM support -- I'm nit-picking it's severity to block
> v2.1 for being released.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message