commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT
Date Thu, 26 May 2016 06:41:29 GMT
+1

Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 25. Mai 2016 um 23:54:

> Hi All:
>
> It would be nice if components would be consistent in their use
> of Checkstyle with LICENSE-header.txt vs. RAT.
>
> Should we just forgo the use of LICENSE-header.txt and rely on RAT 100%?
>
> The following components contain a LICENSE-header.txt:
>
> commons-beanutils
> commons-chain
> commons-codec
> commons-csv
> commons-dbutils
> commons-fileupload
> commons-logging
> commons-math4
> commons-pool2
>
> Gary
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message