Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39B3418C1E for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53997 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2016 10:16:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 53861 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2016 10:16:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 52721 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2016 10:16:14 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:16:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1DFA6C06D1 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:16:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RAlKmeowWK_i for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com (mail-lf0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id BC8655F19B for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id l143so112038804lfe.2 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 02:16:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=rJh+kh5MllAZvij7l6Bd3y6wD0wXEWC94ijFRAOE9mA=; b=uRXmgO55CoHjXv23kstR5jMwc3RRbtEWf2cprxf8y89gcW4KNwxXYTF/+vgHacWs73 1jgRxQRpn74WOhbd67ejSz5FIsfvMqOk/CQqE7ZI+6TNy9tbhu1wMFUV7/iei3JFzb38 2oOO/wsteLBEq71pNXMonW4OOfR7u5gaIUceuZ5bzCGH0R6Fa3NmVnN7XljiOcKsmc9+ sYpGGktuh2orIvEVeCi7vfagvtZbPKm1oddnLgP5d5r5JFY1ibQ1SoqLBP35HqB4TipA XCIIfhD79PZz3J+/djye7XvdbmLe6qUQOHpfST7prH+Pdj8rYfU2FPX8lNK1itX43WYm UZNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=rJh+kh5MllAZvij7l6Bd3y6wD0wXEWC94ijFRAOE9mA=; b=Q4kQj/C3SuxeWT2BIZHBFJcjwbocDVGHjIdV4v9Z8jRoHLv+vhRml2yM6fMFzBB05V 5MqIL1F91vd7ZTxm7+wGUIdG5HkzDHahuFV3mGlw61/fBn9HT5nd+r3RHiIhUCPf/YmF t6NVaiq/onReYuvD6nhUjsW/RbYfyoYKXRv2R5vdNzK3vXNTn/a0H1EzvNR7bFxRn7gb ncTT+AK9n9GCbsBqZ8cDqnTFlgiC8QizVezGsHmJLq/axnpIuq8/hIH99rvlLDIuFsLu H6EEYLupdOZ/aRd4QvtXhDUMyLcuXuORW7odMbzd5w7DhhMpZ4U7hWQ8pL65STBLQcw7 P7yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTl5HXFYaj1BZaUw+vhtEXBjW5BsP9IBAz1H8WxSfBCqNM4adUvvL16lNZMxoEBwvmSUGrKAjrc9v7SgQ== X-Received: by 10.25.211.17 with SMTP id k17mr12576605lfg.16.1456222271927; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 02:11:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.65.232 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 02:10:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <17B91B6B0D9BBC44A1682DABC201C53503EBF6C1@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <56CC23CD.4020804@apache.org> From: Jochen Wiedmann Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:10:52 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [crypto][chimera] Next steps To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > I still have concerns about the IP, since this seems to be an Intel > codebase. I do not have the necessary experience to say what would be the > right way here. My gut feeling tells me, that we should go through the > incubator. WDYT? A possible solution. OTOH: These concerns must be resolved, either way. So, have the Chimera project attempt to resolve them quickly. If possible: Fine. If not: We still have the Incubator as a possibility. For now, the important part seems to me that you explain, what these concerns are? "An Intel codebase" is not a problem as such. Question is: "Available under what license?" Jochen http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org