Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7118E18727 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 02:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7635 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2016 02:33:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 7476 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2016 02:33:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 7464 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2016 02:33:51 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 02:33:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B98361A415A for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 02:33:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.35 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.35 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.329, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xmxed52J5U4d for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 02:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id D9CAD5FABF for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 02:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2016 18:28:42 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,483,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="920894309" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2016 18:28:42 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.5) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 18:28:42 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.153) by fmsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 18:28:41 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.172]) by SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:28:39 +0800 From: "Chen, Haifeng" To: Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [crypto][chimera] Next steps Thread-Topic: [crypto][chimera] Next steps Thread-Index: AQHRa9ACQA5pbKN60EKP+imQynGD8p80mgaAgAAsAACAAotnMA== Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 02:28:39 +0000 Message-ID: <3E657120E422654A9EB626F537B8AA91141020BC@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMjMxMDdjNTItMWI2Mi00ZDA3LTk5YjgtNjZjMzg1YjZhNGFjIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6Im1CSUFNY0ZnME5yRVNONm8zckN1WXJcLzRqM3NiS1FQdzZGZUl5VytzUGdnPSJ9 x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Thanks Benedikt, Uma, Gary, Ole, and Emmanuel Bourg for your support! It's = great to have Chimera to be part of Apache Commons.=20 >>[ Emmanuel Bourg] Define the scope of the project? Do we go after Bouncy = Castle and aim for an equivalent feature set? Agree to make a clear scope of the project. The original Chimera scope is n= ot go after a Bouncy Castle style of library. It targets the gap between th= e application and the under cipher implementations. For example, applicatio= ns uses a lot of InputStream/OutputStream or Channel concepts to read / wri= te a stream of data. Application can share these Crypto streams/channel imp= lementations abstracting various input and output types. Chimera also targe= ts to very important performance optimizations on AES which is used worldwi= de. I suggest this module to be still lightweight and clear in involving, w= hich is the same ideology of Apache Commons. >> [Uma] Here I would like to introduce Haifeng, who lead the efforts in Ch= imera github project. Thanks Uma for introduction. >> [Uma] Me and Haifeng had some discussion yesterday for the list to get c= ommit prevs. May be he could probably get list. Then I think Commons PMC ca= n make a decision on it. Chimera has 5 long standing contributors on github. We can also invite thos= e who contributed the HDFS encryption feature (HDFS-6134 and HADOOP-10150) = to continue participate the involution of this project if they want. Thanks, Haifeng -----Original Message----- From: Gangumalla, Uma [mailto:uma.gangumalla@intel.com]=20 Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 3:07 AM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [crypto][chimera] Next steps Hi Benedikt, Thank you for the Next steps discussion. I thought of pinging you on this :-) =20 Here I would like to introduce Haifeng, who lead the efforts in Chimera gi= thub project.=20 =20 I think Apache Commons Crypto looks good and self descriptive IMO. I am +1 Me and Haifeng had some discussion yesterday for the list to get commit pre= vs. May be he could probably get list. Then I think Commons PMC can make a = decision on it. >move code to an Apache repo (probably git?!) +1 for git >- setup maven build If this point is just about maven build alone, then we should set up Jenkin= s CI build boat as well right, may be we can add this point? Regards, Uma=20 On 2/20/16, 8:29 AM, "Gary Gregory" wrote: >Who are the committers comming along for this component? > >Do we have enough of them? > >I like Apache Commons Crypto. > >Gary >On Feb 20, 2016 3:15 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to discuss the next steps for moving the Chimera component=20 >>to Apache Commons. So far, none of the other PMC members has=20 >>expressed his or her thoughts about this. If nobody brings up=20 >>objections about moving the component to Apache Commons, I'm assuming=20 >>lazy consensus about this. >> >> So the next steps would be: >> - decide on a name for the new component (my proposal was Apache=20 >> Commons >> Crypto) >> - move code to an Apache repo (probably git?!) >> - request a Jira project >> - setup maven build >> - setup project website >> - work on an initial release under Apache Commons coordinates >> >> Anything missing? >> >> Regards, >> Benedikt >> >> -- >> http://home.apache.org/~britter/ >> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter >> http://github.com/britter >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org