On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 11:40:48 +0000, sebb wrote:
> On 25 January 2016 at 09:28, luc <luc@spaceroots.org> wrote:
>> Le 20160125 08:52, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I very much like the idea of taking the name of a famous
>>> mathematician.
>
> In which case it has to be
>
> Euclid or Pythagoras (early)
> or
> Paul Erdős  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erd%C5%91s_number
>
> and everyone has heard of
> John Nash (Beautiful Mind)
I'd rather not have a person's name for the project; as was said
before, it will carry meaning that could be misleading.
> etc.
> In the spirit of recent discussions, how about a RNG to pick the
> mathematician's name for each next incarnation?
>
> ;)
On the other hand, this is really a good idea for naming releases! :)
>>> If it has to be some thing more descriptive: Apache Commons
>>> HttpClient
>>> went
>>> to Apache HttpComponents. How about Apache Math Components as TLP
>>> name?
>
> I quite like Apache Epsilon as a nondescriptive but related name.
>
> [ducks behind bikshed]
What about
* MathBlocks
* MathModules
* modMath
* AJaMa
?
The last one is short while fully descriptive:
AJaMa
is
the Apache JAva MAthematics library
Regards,
Gilles
>>>
>>> Benedikt
>>>
>>> 20160125 8:40 GMT+01:00 Ole Ersoy <ole.ersoy@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Umbrellaish is good. Linear algebra, genetic algorithms, neural
>>>> networks, clustering, monte carlo, simplex...These need an
>>>> umbrella.
>>>> Some
>>>> of the other Apache projects that do math may be interested in
>>>> moving
>>>> that
>>>> piece under the Apache Math umbrella.
>>>>
>>>> Personally I like to see each in a separate repository dedicated
>>>> to the
>>>> subject, along with the corresponding documentation, etc So:
>>>> apachemath (Central repository describing the project as a whole
>>>> with
>>>> the
>>>> documentation that cuts across modules)
>>>> apachemathlinearreal
>>>> apachemathlinearfield
>>>> apachemathoptimizationgenetic
>>>> apachemathoptimizationsimplex
>>>> etc.
>>>>
>>>> And hopefully:
>>>> apachemathoptimizationinteger
>>>> apachemathoptimizationmixed
>>>> And more..
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ole
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 01/24/2016 04:41 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 24, 2016, at 3:17 PM, Gilles
>>>>> <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just plain and simple "Apache Math" maybe?
>>>>>> Or is it taken already?
>>>>>>
>>>>> It's not taken; but I thought it was too broadsounding and in
>>>>> fact
>>>>> umbrellaish. There are other ASF projects that do mathrelates
>>>>> things.
>>>>> I
>>>>> think adding "components" makes it look more like a library of
>>>>> base
>>>>> components that other mathrelated projects can use.
>>>>>
>>>>> Phil
>>>>>
>>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:46:17 0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/24/16 2:16 PM, James Carman wrote:
>>>>>>>> I guess it depends on the scope of what the new TLP is going
>>>>>>>> to do.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is slightly jumping the gun, as we do have the opportunity
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> forming the new TLP to revisit the initial goals of [math]; but
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> suspect that initially at least we will mostly continue to be
a
>>>>>>> generalpurpose Java math library, trying to provide IPclean,
>>>>>>> easily integrated, standard algorithmbased solutions to common
>>>>>>> math
>>>>>>> programming problems. We have grown to the point where we will
>>>>>>> almost certainly break the distribution up into separate
>>>>>>> "components." No umbrella, but likely multiple release
>>>>>>> artifacts.
>>>>>>> Similar in some ways to what happened with [http], which is why
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> suggested the same approach to naming.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regarding picking a mathematician for the name, I don't much
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>> that idea as whoever you choose, you end up loading some math
>>>>>>> area
>>>>>>> and / or cultural bias into the name.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Phil
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Umbrella projects aren't that popular these days, from what
I
>>>>>>>> understand.
>>>>>>>> Maybe an homage to a famous mathematician? Apache Newton?
>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>> Euler?
>>>>>>>> Apache Euclid?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 4:08 PM Phil Steitz
>>>>>>>> <phil.steitz@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We need to agree on a name. My own preference is for
a
>>>>>>>>> boring,
>>>>>>>>> descriptive name, but I am manifestly not a marketing
guy, so
>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>> be offended if others want to be more creative.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My suggestion is
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> MathComponents
>>
>>
>> I would be happy with either Math Components or Math.
>> Also I do favor fancy acronyms that read exactly as well known
>> names (23 years ago, the name of my first mathematics library was
>> an acronym that read "Cantor"), it is probably not a good idea for
>> this new TLP.
>>
>> In any case, the project will most probably be de facto an umbrella
>> project as modularizing it seems in the current mood.
>>
>> best regards,
>> Luc
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hearkens back to HttpComponents, which has worked pretty
>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Phil
>>>>>>>>>

To unsubscribe, email: devunsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, email: devhelp@commons.apache.org
