Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBB8F1827A for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68603 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2015 14:33:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 68457 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2015 14:33:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 68444 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2015 14:33:19 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:33:19 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id BF73A1A0338 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so21738881wmw.1 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 06:33:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.45.72 with SMTP id t69mr284108wmt.32.1448029997736; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 06:33:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.72.86 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 06:33:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:33:17 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Eirik_Bj=C3=B8rsn=C3=B8s=27_notsoserial_deserialization_pr?= =?UTF-8?Q?otection_agent=2C_for_Commons=3F?= From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: =?UTF-8?B?RWlyaWsgQmrDuHJzbsO4cw==?= , Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Eirik, On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Eirik Bj=C3=B8rsn=C3=B8s wrote: > ...Do we need a declare a "winner" between notsoserial and IO-487.. I don't think so, definitely not - both are useful tools for different use cases. > ...My take is that if a donation to Apache Commons can make people be mor= e > aware that this solution exists and that is a benefit for Commons and the > community at large, then I'm not opposed to a donation... Ok, that was my intention in suggesting a donation. The term "I'm not opposed" can mean different things in different cultures, I suppose (or hope) it has a positive meaning in yours ;-) > ...For my own personal interests, keeping it a Github project is probably > simpler as Torsten mentions. .. Yes it makes decisions easier and quicker, OTOH if you look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-487 I find it quite impressive how the code has evolved from the original idea based on the collective feedback and code ideas provided by others. In general, community work means much better things in the end even though it might take longer to get there (ok, I'm a bit biased given my involvement in the ASF in the last few years). -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org