Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of phil.steitz@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.192.170 as permitted sender)
From: Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [math] releasing 3.5 ?
Message-Id: <74B59D78-D166-4D5A-8E41-3CBB2A921B26@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:23:55 -0700
References: <55264462.8020304@spaceroots.org> <55269E48.2050107@gmail.com>
 <a2b9845afc5231f19ce7e6e87c1cf8bd@scarlet.be> <5526B22B.6040308@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5526B22B.6040308@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>

Let's make it 3.5.  I would like the new stuff to be available ASAP=20


> On Apr 9, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Thomas Neidhart <thomas.neidhart@gmail.com> w=
rote:
>=20
>> On 04/09/2015 05:50 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:44:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>>> On 04/09/2015 11:20 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>=20
>>>> Trying to get back on work, after a while ...
>>>>=20
>>>> I have just fixed a very annoying (and difficult to reproduce) bug
>>>> concerning BSP trees in 3.4.1. As I am on it, I will also try to
>>>> fix MATH-1211 created recently.
>>>>=20
>>>> The bug I fixed is really important as it breaks some other tools,
>>>> so I would need to release the fix officially as soon as possible.
>>>>=20
>>>> Therefore, I would like to publish a version 3.5 in the next few days.
>>>> Of course, I will do the release management hurdle. What do you
>>>> think about it?
>>>=20
>>> I see only one actual feature being added to 3.5 so far (the additional
>>> method introduced to Descriptive and SummaryStatistics).
>>>=20
>>> We could copy the current 3_X branch to a 3_4_X branch and remove this
>>> specific feature to really release a pure bugfix release for the 3.4
>>> branch.
>>=20
>> Alternatively, we could leave it (and I should add another similar before=

>> release)...
>> Is there a practical reason that needs preserving the 3.5 option?
>=20
> not really imho, but it would be quite unusual for math to release
> another minor release so quickly (and almost entirely consisting of
> bugfixes).
>=20
> Thomas
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>=20

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org