commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bruno P. Kinoshita" <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2
Date Sat, 04 Apr 2015 05:33:51 GMT
+1 non-binding.
 Build works fine from tag with the following environment:

Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1; 2014-12-14T15:29:23-02:00)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.2.5
Java version: 1.7.0_76, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version: "3.16.0-33-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix"
Kudos for fixing that time zone issue! :)

      From: Benedikt Ritter <>
 To: Commons Developers List <> 
 Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 9:56 AM
 Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2
Hi all,

We've worked through the issues identified in Commons Lang 3.4 RC1, so I
would like to call a vote for releasing Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2.

The changes since RC1 are:
- Fixed TimeZone related problem in test cases
- Fixed broken windows OS detection in SystemUtils
- Added OS X support to SystemUtils
- Fixed Ant build
- Added compatibility section to release notes explaining the change to the

Commons Lang 3.4 RC2 is available for review here: (svn revision 8515)

Maven artifacts are here:

Details of changes since 3.3.2 are in the release notes:

I have tested this with JDK 1.6, 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9 EA using maven 3. Note
that the site build doesn't work with Java 8 and 9 due to problems with
Clirr (clirr doesn't work with Java 8+).

The tag is here: (svn

  (note some *relative* links are broken and the 3.4 directories are not
yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)

Clirr Report (compared to 3.3.2):

RAT Report:


Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no
sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after 15:00 CET 06-April 2015

[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...





  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message