commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ianmca86 <ianmc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release BCEL 6.0 based on RC3
Date Mon, 02 Mar 2015 22:21:50 GMT
i don't like the policy of changing the package name to make a tiny change
to binary compatibility. it makes it impossible to release often

but we're getting way off base. my question is the same as ben's which was
never answered. can we check in the patch for 209 and then release a new
version?


On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:04 PM, garydgregory [via Apache Commons] <
ml-node+s680414n4673389h91@n4.nabble.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:07 PM, sebb <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4673389&i=0>> wrote:
>
> > On 2 March 2015 at 21:33, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4673389&i=1>> wrote:
> > > I'm all for RERO if the release manager is willing.
> >
> > RM willingness is only part of it.
> >
> > RERO is all very well if:
> > - the API is stable; or
> > - frequent changes of package name/Maven coords are acceptable to
> > consumers; or
> > - one does not care about binary compatibilty
> >
> > IMO it's unhelpful to keep pushing the RERO mantra in isolation.
> >
>
> Yes, agreed. I was assuming we all see eye to eye on the semantics.
>
> Gary
>
> >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:37 PM, ianmca86 <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4673389&i=2>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> no one has really answered ben's question yet. if  bcel 209
> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BCEL-209>   is committed
> could
> > we
> > >> cut
> > >> a release? it seems like everyone is okay with the general approach
> > taken
> > >> there
> > >>
> > >> my company also is mandating all projects move to java 8 this month
> > since
> > >> java 7 is discontinued next month. i'm quite nervous that patch has
> been
> > >> outstanding for a month already and we're blocking on it. nine years
> is
> > too
> > >> long between releases and we don't need to drag this out more
> > >>
> > >> regards
> > >> ian
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> View this message in context:
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-BCEL-6-0-based-on-RC3-tp4667129p4673380.html
> > >> Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4673389&i=3>
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4673389&i=4>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > E-Mail: [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4673389&i=5> | [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4673389&i=6>
> > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> > > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4673389&i=7>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4673389&i=8>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4673389&i=9> | [hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4673389&i=10>
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
>
> ------------------------------
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-BCEL-6-0-based-on-RC3-tp4667129p4673389.html
>  To unsubscribe from [VOTE] Release BCEL 6.0 based on RC3, click here
> <http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4667129&code=aWFubWNhODZAZ21haWwuY29tfDQ2NjcxMjl8NTMyODIwMzEy>
> .
> NAML
> <http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>




--
View this message in context: http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-BCEL-6-0-based-on-RC3-tp4667129p4673390.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message