commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben McCann <...@benmccann.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release BCEL 6.0 based on RC3
Date Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:14:13 GMT
Why do you say users would have to rename all their import statements? Is
there a patch pending that we're consider which would change the package
name? I don't think there'd be any changes that be hard for end users to
deal with that I'm aware of.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org> wrote:

> 2015-02-19 16:06 GMT+01:00 Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>:
>
> > Le 19/02/2015 15:17, Ben McCann a écrit :
> > > Perhaps if there are only a few breaking changes we could prioritize
> > > reviewing those first and leave the rest for 6.1.  Alternatively, we
> > could
> > > release what's available now as 6.0 and release all the patches in a
> > couple
> > > months as 7.0.
> >
> > I wouldn't force our users to rename all their import statements in a
> > couple of month as we release BCEL 7.0 with breaking changes because we
> > didn't want to handle a known issue for BCEL 6.0.
> >
> > Let's settle this now.
> >
>
> +1
>
>
> >
> > Emmanuel Bourg
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> http://github.com/britter
>



-- 
about.me/benmccann

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message