commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Ansell <ansell.pe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: your opinion on commons-rdf proposal
Date Sun, 15 Feb 2015 21:35:55 GMT
On 16 February 2015 at 07:53, Reto Gmür <reto@apache.org> wrote:
> My SMTP server was having some problems so the mail below was not posted.
>
> I've made some more commits today with some initial code of a Sparql backed
> implementation, but the interesting bits are still missing....
>
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Reto Gmür <reto@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Minto, all,
>>
>> As you suggested I removed the event listener support from the Graph
>> Interface, it is now part of the WatchableGraph extending interface.
>>
>> Also I've created a new impl.utils project providing mainly abstract
>> classes to facilitate implementations.With this implementors don't have to
>> care about locking and about graph-isomorphism (for .equals in
>> ImmutableGraph).
>>
>> As the final commons-rdf will take a while to emerge I think we should
>> integrate already intermediate steps in clerezza for a smoother transition
>> and especially to avoid working on different incompatible branches.

Hi Reto,

In order to avoid being seen to be biased to any of the
implementations, we have decided to only include a single actual
implementation, the "simple" implementation that Stian wrote
specifically to test the API. Although it was written specifically as
a test driver, it does provide an un-optimised in-memory model for
very light-weight use if people require that for very small sets.

Perhaps it would be more appropriate to include that implementation in Stanbol?

Cheers,

Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message