Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 455A810C57 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 20:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91373 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2015 20:38:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 91221 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2015 20:38:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 91210 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2015 20:38:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 20:38:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.47] (HELO mail-la0-f47.google.com) (209.85.215.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 20:38:51 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id hz20so20880628lab.6 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:36:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4BLYHv87PR0eROozpt+qzlul6GyDjJaKmQdfhjTJlMA=; b=RZMomitM9seEDIDBwNZ5qsSH876+ydFPg1erq3UhH9A2AHLFWo14drPGCYgq1V85do SUSVPf4TiGafL69pxrRB4ZBrvYMbCSjHQjJcuwtptguRlB/hn9+e3Z5gy+6ItoZo3YmB CmRS//COuFH2FMi2+tVKlEiuNstyXXhnzay8IBT4kLs+QAeZAsX54TsU+gxVViuLHex+ 0xfVdfLAWsoae/OIlt48fKOKY15EpTu+JGtQR8hik7bPtVHDlxJORAF9hiqvemsnBDPW fb0BzddAc6BEKGB9yE4a+oG31dmxvcdq9Dp0cGohv5Z2hbcdbzLD17qU9/Yh4xElT3hk lA0w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlslC5Kit2vH2jOG2uSCufc0RuS8/lpacx29zFjPonWsPgc6n47LvK5X5+YfTlH9hSGvRIb X-Received: by 10.112.42.47 with SMTP id k15mr17768686lbl.75.1421440598208; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:36:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jcarman@carmanconsulting.com Received: by 10.112.151.196 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:36:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <23d5b03fc1cdb4079ceb52c55458f0e3@scarlet.be> <54B8ECAA.2090801@apache.org> <54B94324.6030807@gmail.com> <9aea5a713d8832301c7231acfe16bc55@scarlet.be> From: James Carman Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:36:18 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CdV2NXqBDstgpPyxNGuvJ0ovs4Y Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ALL] Too much traffic on the "dev" ML To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Or, they could move to TLP. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrot= e: > I'm not sure what infra will say about managing multiple dev lists for on= e > project, but we can ask. > > I would suggest that if a project wants its own dev list, a VOTE be calle= d. > Commons is still _one_ project, so all Commons PMC committers votes shoul= d > count, not just folks involved in that single project. > > Gary > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Gilles > wrote: > >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:58:12 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >>> On 1/16/15 5:05 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible wrote: >>> >>>> Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >>>> >>>> If the volume of messages discourages new contributors from joining t= he >>>>> project that's indeed an issue. >>>>> >>>> >> Two or three people said so. >> >> We had an average of 400 messages per >>>>> month in 2014, >>>>> >>>> >> Between 2014-10-21 and now, the count of messages addressed to one of th= e >> "commons" lists is 4387, that is an average of about 50 per day (1500 pe= r >> month). >> >> that's on par with maven-dev, half of tomcat-dev and 1/7 >>>>> of lucene-dev. >>>>> >>>> >> The problem is not primarily "dev", it is that some people simply cannot >> spend even more time to cater for all the Commons projects; yet we recei= ve >> all the notifications. >> It's basic care for others' comfort to fix this at the source. >> Is it so difficult to understand that I don't want to be flooded with >> notifications of commits to a codebase which I don't contribute to? >> >> It's also significantly below where Commons used to be when we had a >>> *lot* more active committers and contributors. >>> >> >> So it can be worse. That's very comforting indeed. >> >> >> Gilles >> >> >>>>> I don't think splitting the list by component is a good idea though, >>>>> this will kill the community (the 'all' list is unlikely to be popula= r). >>>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>> >>> +1 and lets maybe cut the threads like this (self-referential) one ;) >>> >>> Phil >>> >>>> >>>> - J=C3=B6rg >>>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org