Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 23:50:15 +0100
From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@zusammenkunft.net>
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vfs] PMC: please review sandbox' NOTICE.txt
Message-ID: <20150111235015.000070fd.ecki@zusammenkunft.net>
In-Reply-To: <54B2C205.4090202@gmail.com>
References: <20150111182212.00005c40.ecki@zusammenkunft.net>
	<54B2B57F.6010102@gmail.com>
	<20150111190018.00004843.ecki@zusammenkunft.net>
	<54B2C205.4090202@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello,

thanks for the comments Phil.

I have removed the mention of sandbox from the toplevel NOTICE.txt and
the sandbox/NOTICE.txt again.

I am not sure what to put in a readme, but since I already explained
the sandbox situation on the new site, I will not anything besides that:

http://people.apache.org/~ecki/commons-vfs/commons-vfs2-sandbox/


I don't think we will find a good replacement for jcifs (and I am
certainly not trying to built it :), so I would guess the smb provider
stays there for some time or we drop it (i.e. if externally maintained).
There might be an option for the mime provider, will see if I can get
help with that.

I have understood that I do not have to improve the situation that a
sandbox artifact could "look" official, so I keep the notice files in
there (just as 2.0 was).

Gruss
Bernd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org