commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE][JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 3)
Date Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:20:31 GMT
Ok so you only speak about dist src bundle?

Not sure it does need to cancel the vote, this is not a major issue
IMO and can be fixed for next one




Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2015-01-26 12:39 GMT+01:00 sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>:
> On 26 January 2015 at 11:30, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>> @sebb: not sure I get it right, it references LICENSE.txt correctly for me
>
> Not sure what you mean by "it" above.
>
> As I already wrote:
> The NOTICE file should not reference LICENSE.txt
> Nor should it reference LICENSE.xerox, because the Xerox license does
> not require attribution.
>
> However LICENSE.txt must include - or point to as separate file(s) -
> any 3rd party licenses for bundled code.
> It does not reference xerox currently, so there is a problem which
> arises because of the source file.
>
> The user must be able to determine the licensing requirements from
> LICENSE and NOTICE without having to look around for other license
> files.
> And the NOTICE file must not contain anything that is not required.
>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-26 12:27 GMT+01:00 sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>:
>>> On 26 January 2015 at 11:19, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> if that's the case +1 but anyway it doesnt hurt
>>>
>>> But it does have some consequences, because of the license issues.
>>>
>>>> @Thomas: before dropping it can you confirm it a last time please?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-01-26 12:18 GMT+01:00 sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>:
>>>>> Why not just drop it entirely?
>>>>>
>>>>> If that is the only Xerox-licensed file, it is not essential to the
>>>>> operation of JCS, so why keep it?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25 January 2015 at 21:44, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this is not packaged AFAIK, just here as a sample I guess.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2015-01-25 22:35 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>:
>>>>>>> is that all?
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src/aspect/org/apache/commons/Trace.aj
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wouldn't it be actually quite easy to replace this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 25 January 2015, 19:30, Thomas Vandahl <tv@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> > On 25.01.15 17:00, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>  It does AFAIK - was not here and just propagated existing
legal text - and
>>>>>>>>>  that is why it is referenced in core and not all artifacts.
>>>>>>>>>   Le 25 janv. 2015 16:55, "sebb" <sebbaz@gmail.com>
a écrit
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The XEROX license relates to the file
>>>>>>>> /commons-jcs-core/src/aspect/org/apache/commons/Trace.aj
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If the file continues to be part of the distribution, the
license file
>>>>>>>> must be present, at least that is my understanding of the
Apache
>>>>>>>> requirements.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This was discussed at length when JCS 1.3 was released.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bye, Thomas.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message