Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CBF99D2F for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59446 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2014 00:49:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 59319 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2014 00:49:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 59306 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2014 00:49:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:49:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:49:09 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hy10so2692236vcb.20 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:48:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=1SJ6Y/nm+PBVMTs47qX1ym5OYwJXiLgwpFABCLzLUQA=; b=lwlGiF7M1GH2kMmYz2D1nnQKJ2TufdIrqOpMmm+eHW0wYAzM5Occ2lMfMJSVOxNz5D XR/3gMKuE8i8yYb6YllSMM0U0ReJDrYkgS6aIdomCLtU9NquwkPUa4i82Kz34z47setM O3PzQa9f9XRzT6ftDbAxWag641bbIHKImAEFyuOvwb4jHRlyp5W8Jx4z62dZnjIVhY2J SLYwXIDdJzKCsV4w9BCnzW0kdr/B2qaJXbVP8ONJiDQYaZhKtij/9ClBmjP1hhZjhb32 q+MpYbXdEjUTocGPK1/fTBsgBYJgqIY8upHCsftnuTytZHCZHw/V0gjKi4MfG+UOZ/CO nSOQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.110.195 with SMTP id ic3mr10164378vdb.47.1419382102888; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:48:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.36.174 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:48:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5499E546.80207@gmail.com> References: <5499A740.9070705@gmail.com> <5499E546.80207@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:48:22 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release pool 2.3 based on RC1 From: sebb To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 23 December 2014 at 21:57, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 12/23/14 1:11 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 23 December 2014 at 17:32, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> Tag: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_2_3_RC1/ > > > r1647682 > >>> >>> Tags are not immutable; > My tags are. But someone else could change it. >> the vote thread needs the revision. >> >>> Release: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/ > r7545 >> Likewise, the URL does not uniquely identify what artifacts are being voted on. >> A revision or hashes of the artifacts are needed. >> >> Also need link to KEYS file so can check the sigs > > My key has been on the commons KEYs file for 10+ years now. I would > expect Commons PMC members to know where to grab that file. But the vote thread should allow anyone to review the code, not just those in the know. >> >>> Maven: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1070 >>> >>> Site: >>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool/pool-2.3-rc1/ >>> >>> Release notes: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >>> >>> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours (26-Dec 17:30 GMT) >>> >>> [ ] +1 Release this >>> [ ] +0 Ok, but... >>> [ ] -0 Really should fix... >>> [X] -1 We should not release this RC >> The code contains LinkedBlockingDeque which is based on 3rd party code. >> There is no corresponding mention in the LICENSE file, this needs to be added. > > This is Apache Harmony code. The ASF license header is there in the > source. Yes, but the NOTICE file contains a reference to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain This is a license, and if it applies to the code, it needs to be in the LICENSE file. If it does not apply, why is it in NOTICE? I've found what I assume is the original file: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/java/branches/java6/classlib/modules/concurrent/src/main/java/java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingDeque.java This has the header: /* * Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166 * Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at * http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain */ This does not look to me like a copyright statement that needs to be removed to NOTICE. See: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers Seems to me that a simple mention in LICENSE should be enough. > Phil >> >> I'm not sure that there should be a mention in the NOTICE file. >> There does not appear to be an attribution requirement. >> Or was the attribution removed from existing code? >> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org