Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOGo0VYr0rsdRydZEKMzJ3SiaNbtNdp6ugf9awUYDW3c6wnyAA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CACLE=7O=XnG=yAyrsfZe+HGXiYt-e1JkBrLRAs=rUpsRkNJQgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOGo0VaD4hTRNJ0pBFryScSb6dxFxBtDU=C7Hiv1pFMipNB_-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACLE=7OKDW5zopX=HV9i33DzT_fm4eefUs3rkVp9CW5nKRxNBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOGo0VYr0rsdRydZEKMzJ3SiaNbtNdp6ugf9awUYDW3c6wnyAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:36:43 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CACLE=7MunSSYa6+XmbNN0cL=0ZMkjk1xzG3Ps-oxVdDtpPurPg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 2)
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

ok,

yeah sources jars are the ones without these files


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-12-10 11:30 GMT+01:00 sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>:
> On 10 December 2014 at 09:36, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2014-12-10 10:07 GMT+01:00 sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>:
>>> There are some discrepancies between the source artifact and the SVN tag.
>>>
>>> The source artifact contains derby.log under commons-jcs-jcache-openjpa
>>>
>>> The source bundles should not contain the doap file
>>>
>>> Those problems can be addressed by fixing the appropriate assembly descriptors.
>>> Note that the presence of derby.log shows how easy it is for bundles
>>> to contain spurious files, and why it is necessary to compare the
>>> source bundle with the SVN tag as part of checking the RC.
>>> Luckily in this case the file is harmless, but it could have been
>>> anything lying around in the workspace.
>>>
>>> The following directory trees are in SVN but not the source bundle:
>>>
>>> auxiliary-builds
>>> commons-jcs-sandbox
>>> src/experimental
>>>
>>> This is not a blocker, but they are a nuisance when comparing source and SVN.
>>> Maybe consider creating a branch and then drop them from trunk?
>>>
>>>
>>> The NOTICE.txt file must not contain references to LICENSE.txt
>>> The LICENSE.xerox file does not appear to require attribution, so the
>>> NOTICE.txt file must not reference Xerox.
>>> The LICENSE.txt file ought to contain the full text of all required
>>> licenses; failing that it needs to reference any external files by
>>> name.
>>>
>>> The source jars must have NOTICE and LICENSE files in the META-INF directories
>>>
>>
>> Which jar doesnt have it? binaries have them, didnt check
>> source/javadoc ones but other should have
>
> As I wrote: it was one of the _source_ jars that did not have the files.
>
> As it happens, I checked commons-jcs-jcache-2.0-beta-1-sources
>
> The same applies to commons-jcs-jcache-extras-2.0-beta-1-sources
> and presumably the others.
>
>>> -1 for the N&L issues.
>>>
>>> On 5 December 2014 at 10:11, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Another try with license/notice files
>>>>
>>>> - here is the maven repo:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065
>>>> - assemblies can be found here
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065/org/apache/commons/commons-jcs-dist/2.0-beta-1/
>>>> - tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
>>>> - KEYS:  https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>>>> - Site staging is: http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
>>>> - rat report is (not I delete LICENSE.xerox and zipcodes.txt from this
>>>> report directly cause I didn't find a way to configure apache-rat
>>>> correctly with maven site):
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/rat-report.html
>>>>
>>>> About last vote we spoke about should assembly contain a readme, the
>>>> site or something like that, I checked few projects and it doesn't
>>>> seem mandatory so I didn't update them.
>>>>
>>>> Please review the release candidate and vote.
>>>> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now or until we get
>>>> 3 PMC votes.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>>> [ ] +-0 OK, but...
>>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org