Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2754C49F for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 18:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61415 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2014 18:05:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 61277 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2014 18:05:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 61265 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2014 18:05:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 18:05:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.42] (HELO mail-qa0-f42.google.com) (209.85.216.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 18:05:11 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id n4so113398qaq.1 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:03:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y2IFePNxP7yDsk68vq2OqVunJlG6DbP7jHtQ4QG9rtM=; b=suQORCPz/CzKT5gQGKOBfKJgiZToLx9Wy5DwQNRT/YKuVQ3Er9SMUM0Siqdn9Hdy5M zd0rNk4KGqenYh0WFd/x157hlrsye2kp6ifT0sQROOQpepc3oDgv9C/uEwBViSK7Qdw0 yi4nocqoieW+5q3CRjxmX0UN9u+zAtqfJXJYbPpDUr9w98A5HRNRp86dT78sbHxVq96x Jf/3o++yDpv2y5Gb47uTg8FuJ2NMvA1HnYq8XHaAej9/A2VoJF9unwPmHmCp0GYnZnC4 aitAdzOnjlQYNkg2QiDbEW8biitTJbNWBpDxMSDQQaZSwWW8CPtDMrhNHBPC3pz2LTwu cFOQ== X-Received: by 10.140.104.33 with SMTP id z30mr23854367qge.75.1418493800895; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:03:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.96.182.73 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:03:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <419827362.161746.1418473586135.JavaMail.yahoo@jws11130.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> From: Romain Manni-Bucau Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 19:03:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: commons-parent maven pom highly broken? To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org @Sebb: when trying to release jcs I had a lot of trouble just because [commons] parent pom doesn't follow asf rules (remote resource plugin is deactivated where it is correct in apache pom for instance) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-13 18:56 GMT+01:00 sebb : > On 13 December 2014 at 17:51, Romain Manni-Bucau = wrote: >> At least some skip should be removed since it breaks apache parent behav= ior. > > No idea what you mean here - if you think there is a bug, file a JIRA iss= ue. > >> Le 13 d=C3=A9c. 2014 18:42, "sebb" a =C3=A9crit : >> >>> On 13 December 2014 at 12:26, Mark Struberg wrote: >>> > Hi! >>> > >>> > I've never seen any other ASF project where it is such a torture to >>> release. >>> > This is partly because the quality level is really high, but a big pa= rt >>> of it is that we don't have a mature parent pom. >>> >>> Sorry, but I don't think that is at all relevant. >>> Releasing is tedious because Maven does not really support non-Maven >>> release directories (i.e. www.apache.org/dist/commons) so work-rounds >>> are needed. >>> This is true whatever the parent pom is used. >>> >>> It's partly also that Maven does some things well, but when >>> adjustments are needed, it can be all but impossible to work out how >>> to coax it to do what's needed. >>> >>> > >>> > I have no clue why we don't just use the common apache parent pom. I'= ve >>> NEVER experienced such issues like missing NOTICE and LICENSE with it. = It's >>> really much more solid than our own one. >>> >>> Until very recently the ASF parent pom was broken, and with no sign of >>> any fixes. >>> For example, it did not allow override of the compiler plugin version, >>> and there were a few other issues with it. >>> >>> There are stil issues with LICENSE and NOTICE, because the >>> automatically created ones are not always correct. >>> I'm not sure it creates the appropriate source and javadoc jars either. >>> >>> And it does not create decent manifests. >>> >>> The Commons Pom includes a lot of common setup that would otherwise >>> have to be added to each component's parent pom. >>> That is not an efficient way of proceeding. >>> >>> There are various other additional optional features in the Commons >>> pom which are useful for testing. >>> >>> I think the CP pom works fine for single module projects. >>> I'm not sure about multimodule projects, but is the ASF pom any better? >>> >>> Rather than raise unsubstantiated criticisms of the CP pom, file bugs >>> for any problems and/or try fixing them. >>> >>> > LieGrue, >>> > strub >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >>> >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org