Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0A44115C1 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 14:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13643 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2014 14:42:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 13525 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2014 14:42:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 13513 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2014 14:42:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:42:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of garydgregory@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.52] (HELO mail-qa0-f52.google.com) (209.85.216.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:42:28 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n8so1206088qaq.11 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 07:42:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+EOi7EQirbtrkS9MCdGd6kMUV5Ua5BQ8DDSklVqdqyY=; b=LQaIUp/iuKMO2s78QafLUTOo0PUW47NT22vwo4yDnpND30bgIEdnLN+KQpinul1g2u hCGsqxUB7/3nuMEWsTeixL14kHLh2ctuucbqkR4SdLurLE8KVrUPhmrvjcvQHcts4QX8 wP9PWQlL8jcgrl/zcIMutSOHAHLRcwLmHSl6ZmLD+oTs0Sspj0zFxZoWxPZYdZ1PhTdH rI3jATkQNPBtgVj4LXIoX6YLTj+NKUChKv4WdsRm8Jc24RBhzoDVm3CbqxSKrFUTzbDt 3o/YcosxTJRo4C0Xip2exYjSCQMesYUoOeQGP1YqTLfKcOi8BKnaw+S/jBJdgUuZ3lum yWmA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.17.9 with SMTP id 9mr13345359qgc.47.1410273332927; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 07:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.128.84 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 07:35:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <540EFDD5.9010007@apache.org> References: <540EFDD5.9010007@apache.org> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:35:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [discuss] Vote to git it? From: Gary Gregory To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c0b36a0ba5510502a2d9a2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c0b36a0ba5510502a2d9a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 09/09/2014 15:10, Gary Gregory a =C3=A9crit : > > Should we vote to move Commons to git one component at a time (as Math > just > > has), or just vote to move them all at once and be done with it and the > > inevitable? > > I'm fine with both solutions. Do we have a consensus to migrate the > components now? > I started this thread to get a feel for it. Some folks have a lot of experience with git, some have none. Most of us here know Subversion 'by default'. Understanding that and the comfort of folks of do not know git and their willingness to get into a new VCS is what I am trying to understand. I do not want to call a [vote] with out talking first. Gary > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > --=20 E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition JUnit in Action, Second Edition Spring Batch in Action Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --001a11c0b36a0ba5510502a2d9a2--