commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [discuss] Vote to git it?
Date Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:25:02 GMT
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> wrote:

> Le 10/09/2014 11:43, Gilles a écrit :
>
> > This use case does not convince me at all: when working on a feature,
> > you always do it locally (modifying code, preparing unit tests), and
> > SVN certainly does not force you to experiment publicly; it's rather
> > the project's policy that forbids you to commit crappy code. :-)
>
> The advantage here is that you can split you local work into smaller
> commits before pushing them to the server. That makes the review easier
> by clearly separating the various steps of the implementation. It's also
> convenient to rollback some of the changes and correct them without
> starting from scratch.
>
>
Can you chose whether you retain the local commit history or not when
pushing it to the server?

Niall



>
> > [The advantages of "git" must be somewhere else.]
>
> Local commits should be one of them though, since it's on the SVN roadmap
> :)
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3626
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message