commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Migrate Commons Math to Git
Date Thu, 24 Jul 2014 06:04:17 GMT
2014-07-23 19:17 GMT+02:00 Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com>:

> On 7/22/14, 10:47 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> > Hi Phil
> >
> >
> > 2014-07-22 19:01 GMT+02:00 Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Looks like other projects are running VOTEs to ensure there is
> >> consensus for this action and including references to VOTE threads
> >> in INFRA JIRAs.  Lets do this.  The action I am proposing is that we
> >> request a new ASF git repo, make the current svn repo read-only
> >> (adding a README to make it clear) and change github mirroring to
> >> use the git repo.   Votes, please.  This vote will close in 72
> >> hours.  Note that this VOTE applies only to [math], i.e.
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math.
> >>
> > note that there already is a git repo for math at http://git.apache.org.
> > This currently mirrors the SVN. My opinion is, that this mirror should be
> > made writable (the sync hook to svn should be removed of corse).
>
> I don't think that is the standard way that Infra likes to manage
> these moves.  That repo is intended to just house RO mirrors, IIUC
> the git-wip docs [1].
>

okay, whatever infra thinks is best... I was just afraid we can not use
commons-math as repo name. But since the writable git repos have their own
URL space we will have:

git.apache.org/commons-math.git (old, read only)
git-wip-us.apache.org/commons-math.git (writable)

Benedikt


>
> Phil
>
> [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
> >
> >
> >> [ ] +1 go for it
> >> [ x ] +0 OK, but...
> >>
> > I would like to see components move to git, but I'm not a developer of
> > Commons Math, so I can't tell whether it makes sense for math.
> >
> > Regarding documentation about git: I think there is plenty of information
> > out there. I think however that the community should agree on a branching
> > model, since there a several possible ways to develop with git branches.
>
> >
> > br,
> > Benedikt
> >
> >
> >> [ ] -0  Not happy about this, because...
> >> [ ] -1 We should not do this
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Phil
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message