Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-148525-apmail-commons-dev-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAAF811187
	for <apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Sat,  5 Apr 2014 05:22:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 65405 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2014 05:22:58 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64841 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2014 05:22:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@commons.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@commons.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.commons.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64833 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2014 05:22:53 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 05:22:53 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mikhail.mazursky@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.45 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.160.45] (HELO mail-pb0-f45.google.com) (209.85.160.45)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 05:22:47 +0000
Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id uo5so4357721pbc.4
        for <dev@commons.apache.org>; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 22:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=WwoPly2Z14+uJ42nBep/gWrgBMqM6ytXIyohBAPITm0=;
        b=dFo4KPrYtgbCysUn5wgzkl3jucRTJCilv2KCa016GF/qmQXv7TRIZDj8SfoCPrnIiI
         IS0yRtyQ88xM0sMYiWC75nej1VZBKkM53oAtsij4HyZBrlxR0ifFfMSwA38Yv6nlnKfF
         ngdDSmwuqmXBb1sBQ4zhbChhnosBPbqholmI49qQpEQAegbhcBgXbI1A2gb+Xz5qVWAL
         7FAKH9BoSNmjfpA4F52PX0tVEc6Z48ADFXEzTtZ49QjHYzv0lXiOC4nmiIf9Gw6kx8tU
         9xrwC2TF7yUDsbvJ+B2SEQlQged/m5l/1nTLkp6Iunw/S1XkbhlKHdZEbg9V+19ZuQ8T
         Bxrw==
X-Received: by 10.66.146.170 with SMTP id td10mr19007277pab.105.1396675342570;
 Fri, 04 Apr 2014 22:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.10.165 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 22:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mikhail Mazursky <mikhail.mazursky@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 11:22:02 +0600
Message-ID: 
 <CALaYgJX-5cdceLrLM4dSQzZeLARhZujdHvyrgpfkwpvE=UY6wg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [Lang] Add zero copy write methods to StrBuilder
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b678880b9990804f644d14e
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--047d7b678880b9990804f644d14e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hello commons developers,

recently I filled an issue in Jira regarding adding zero copy write methods
to StrBuilder. I ask everyone interested to provide your feedback on the
issue and the proposed patch (attached to the issue in Jira). All the
details and a usecase are in the issue.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-993

Kind regards,
Mikhail.

--047d7b678880b9990804f644d14e--