Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOGo0VaGbgj3T-AwKWA8Zs-6iGJhxQA+1r8CD8kGHmWfCKnZjA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAB917RLgBEj7JngGVob05iyMj1G0OzoCAhUBLV_dmow_1Baq1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOGo0VZ1a3P-6QrnCHw52Rs2Q3xB_YKN98oFr1S6DQQMnMsqhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAB917RKZ_qekY=z_tqznz2OBnoZidoVWCrNKWB2oK0V_uU0UcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOGo0VadDLKVqV=mVbfrF1kXMfn+DO+LWpwPnkpOBHkU9xtKQQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAB917RKzrW2R0bvDUP3sAoEhBM0mkVz=0tvRRMeg9Tpx0eukFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOGo0VaGbgj3T-AwKWA8Zs-6iGJhxQA+1r8CD8kGHmWfCKnZjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 11:57:04 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAB917RJ768tcZ5A5zqoKKxtvJZPMJU72BpJEi6J_Z1sbwF8yRA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LANG] NumberUtils#isNumber() returns false for "0.0", "0.4790",
 et al
From: Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec53f2e27c1a66d04f5bcad78

--bcaec53f2e27c1a66d04f5bcad78
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

The RC will have to wait until tomorrow, since I don't have enough time to
go through the hole process today :-)


2014-03-28 16:10 GMT+01:00 sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>:

> On 28 March 2014 15:06, Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org> wrote:
> > 2014-03-28 16:04 GMT+01:00 sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> On 28 March 2014 15:00, Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > 2014-03-28 14:50 GMT+01:00 sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> >> On 28 March 2014 09:34, Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi guys,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > some of you have already discussed LANG-992. Do we need to push
> out an
> >> >> > immediate bugfix after we have resolved this?
> >> >>
> >> >> Perhaps.
> >> >>
> >> >> > Is this issue fixed in http://svn.apache.org/r1582585 ?
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, AFAIK.
> >> >>
> >> >> > I'll have some time this weekend to create an RC.
> >> >>
> >> >> If so, IMO it should be 3.3.2 rather than 3.4.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Yes, usually I set the version to the next minor after doing a
> release.
> >> > That's why it has been set to 3.4-SNAPSHOT after 3.3.1
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> There seems to be one new field:
> >> >>
> >> >> SystemUtils.IS_JAVA_1_8
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > my opinion is, that the clirr report for a patch release should be
> empty.
> >> > In this case Clirr will show one info, so following this convention is
> >> > would be 3.4. OTOH a minor release should introduce a few more
> features
> >> > beside a new field...
> >>
> >> Exactly; this is such a trivial change I don't think it warrants a
> >> minor version bump.
> >> It could be considered as a bug fix (but not a regression, as is the
> >> case for the octal issue)
> >>
> >
> > Okay, I'll prepare 3.3.2 RC1 tomorrow morning.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

--bcaec53f2e27c1a66d04f5bcad78--