commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [LANG] BC breaking changes in trunk
Date Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:03:19 GMT
ISTR someone saying it seemed like it would be safe to make this break in
BC because there were likely to be no existing FastDateParser subclasses.
However, the compatibility was preserved in FastDateFormat by passing
through a null *to* FastDateParser, so doing the same on FastDateParser
itself would seem simple and equivalent.

Matt


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>wrote:

> Can we add back a ctor?
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm preparing lang 3.3 RC 1. While looking through the reports I've
> > noticed, that we have a Clirr error in 3.3 compared to 3.2.1 [1]. This
> was
> > introduced in r1557882 [2]. The change is a result of LANG-950 [3]
> >
> > The question for me is: can we handle this change without breaking BC?
> >
> > Benedikt
> >
> > [1]
> http://people.apache.org/~britter/commons-sites/lang/clirr-report.html
> > [2] http://svn.apache.org/r1557882
> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-950
> >
> > --
> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> > http://github.com/britter
> >
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message