Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33911100AB for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36557 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2014 12:41:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 36479 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2014 12:40:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 36470 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jan 2014 12:40:55 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 12:40:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-wi0-f171.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username britter, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 12:40:55 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id bz8so6860689wib.10 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 04:40:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=jtsP/W661fIev6o2vnnx52vC86O6nmGoNYRLr3wSS+c=; b=lWFyBRAZ6BwRGSG48iqJudU6JdzbhLJYtf17Prio9kfuwZx/Tcj4qPUUbU9tJffsib 1DqvP5T5dvDFsP03R50IahuVtQq4xXHl/qYpn6GNsLgvAf3a402fGa5FUgJbDWqMztv5 /6e2HFJ8um0qXLIqXh3xIVkmLY3dmlGzrUnO9jlG2tCUcsadSiJ8O+g3WkzpBlL040kV ydGAYUfiJAoMW+hoG4v5SoYBgxCEcNeJiUPBvv2y8Qx/10Om2PLvSomy60Rsnj/eKQUc nWEIHVBgyY/plrroRErVe2uvX/z0pO7x71wojdsWT0DrkdRXMBE8o3IJYtvFF+zHlmv8 7hGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.104.164 with SMTP id gf4mr19542085wib.35.1389271253788; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 04:40:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.6.231 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 04:40:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:40:53 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LANG] Delaying announcement of 3.2.1 some more From: Benedikt Ritter To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cc9f6894309404ef88ebeb --14dae9cc9f6894309404ef88ebeb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2014/1/9 Gary Gregory > Did the date end up getting committed in trunk or the RC tag? For me it > only ends up in the tag. > I only committed it t the tag. That's why is has been overwritten by the site build from trunk. The problem with only committing the date to the tag is, that you have to remember to commit it trunk, if the vote succeeds (which I haven't ;-) Benedikt > > Gary > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Benedikt Ritter > Date:01/09/2014 01:24 (GMT-05:00) > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: [LANG] Delaying announcement of 3.2.1 some more > > Hi all, > > yesterday I've released 3.2.1. I also updated the site from the tag. This > time I fllowed Garys advice and prepared the tag so that it could be used > to create the site: I set the release date in changes.xml to the date the > RC was created and changed the texts on index.xml. So erverything should be > fine, right? > But today I'm looking at the page and it has been recreated frm trunk! > Sadly I've forgotten to update changes.xml and index.xml in trunk > yesterday. So now the download page points to the 3.2.1 artifacts but > index.xml says the latest release is 3.2. > > The question is: who updated the site? I don't the anything on > commits@c.a.o. > @Sebb: is this some Contionuum magic? > I'll have to rebuild the site tonight when I'm at home. After that I'll > send the announcement. > > Benedikt > -- > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > http://github.com/britter > -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter --14dae9cc9f6894309404ef88ebeb--