commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [LANG] Delaying announcement of 3.2.1 some more
Date Thu, 09 Jan 2014 14:26:12 GMT
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:02 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 9 January 2014 12:46, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hm, my understanding is that trunk only contains snapshots.
>
> Yes.
>
> But what has that to do with the dates in documentation?
>

I thought we were talking about dates that are generated from changes.xml.
Are you talking about hard-coded dates in site files that generate HTML?

Gary


> > G
> >
> > -------- Original message --------
> > From: Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org>
> > Date:01/09/2014  07:40  (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [LANG] Delaying announcement of 3.2.1 some more
> >
> > 2014/1/9 Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Did the date end up getting committed in trunk or the RC tag? For me it
> >> only ends up in the tag.
> >>
> >
> > I only committed it t the tag. That's why is has been overwritten by the
> > site build from trunk.
> > The problem with only committing the date to the tag is, that you have to
> > remember to commit it trunk, if the vote succeeds (which I haven't ;-)
> >
> > Benedikt
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> -------- Original message --------
> >> From: Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org>
> >> Date:01/09/2014  01:24  (GMT-05:00)
> >> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> >> Subject: [LANG] Delaying announcement of 3.2.1 some more
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> yesterday I've released 3.2.1. I also updated the site from the tag.
> This
> >> time I fllowed Garys advice and prepared the tag so that it could be
> used
> >> to create the site: I set the release date in changes.xml to the date
> the
> >> RC was created and changed the texts on index.xml. So erverything
> should be
> >> fine, right?
> >> But today I'm looking at the page and it has been recreated frm trunk!
> >> Sadly I've forgotten to update changes.xml and index.xml in trunk
> >> yesterday. So now the download page points to the 3.2.1 artifacts but
> >> index.xml says the latest release is 3.2.
> >>
> >> The question is: who updated the site? I don't the anything on
> >> commits@c.a.o.
> >> @Sebb: is this some Contionuum magic?
> >>  I'll have to rebuild the site tonight when I'm at home. After that I'll
> >> send the announcement.
> >>
> >> Benedikt
> >> --
> >> http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> >> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> >> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> >> http://github.com/britter
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> > http://github.com/britter
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message