commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [LANG] Next steps
Date Thu, 02 Jan 2014 15:41:55 GMT
2014/1/2 Duncan Jones <djones@cantab.net>

> On 2 January 2014 14:40, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 to it all.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > -------- Original message --------
> > From: Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org>
> > Date:01/02/2014  05:29  (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> > Subject: [LANG] Next steps
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've successfully gone through my first release (wasn't as bad as I had
> > expected it to be). I still have to do the Jira stuff, will do that
> tonight
> > probably.
> > So, here is what I have in mind for lang as next steps.
> >
> > Move User Guide from Website to package-info.java:
> > The user guide is structured in terms of packages in lang. It looks like
> > the package-info.java files are better suited for this kind of
> information.
> > Since Lang isn't a framework where multiple parts play together, I don't
> > see the need for a "real" user guide.
> >
> > Push out 3.2.1:
> > Although the two issues identified by Oliver and Jörg didn't block
> release
> > 3.2, I'd like to push out a bugfix (probably containing the above
> changes)
> >
> > Move to git:
> > We have talked about this a lot, and I had the feeling, that the people
> > working on [lang] are fine with moving to git. I'm planning to work out a
> > little guide on how to work on issues, create branches, create releases
> > using git. But this will probably take a while.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Benedikt
> > --
> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> > http://github.com/britter
>
> Sounds great to me. I think we also need to focus on a faster release
> cycle. The idea of "release early, release often" is regularly quoted
> by people on the ML, yet it took us over two years to move from 3.1 to
> 3.2. It would be nice to see a smaller feature set in each release,
> thus allowing for more regular releases.
>

It always depends on peoples interests and their spare time.
But yes, it took way to long for 3.2 to be released.


>
> Thanks for getting 3.2 out the door!
>
> Duncan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message