commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header
Date Sat, 04 Jan 2014 11:20:07 GMT
2014/1/4 Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>

> To Sebb and Bendikt:
>
> I'm ambivalent on whether the reports are release version or snapshot, I
> can see value in both (one encourages users, the other contributors).
>

IMHO for the latter group tools like Sonar are far better suited, since
they are more up to date. This is why I have added a link to lang's sonar
instance to the web site [1].


> However the site _has_ to be trunk. Having to do a new release just so we
> can update the site doesn't strike me as healthy.
>

Best would be if we could manage to keep the reports for released versions
while also being able to update the site when ever we need it. The only way
to do this, seems to be checking in the whole website of older releases
like we do for codec [2]

Benedikt

[1] http://svn.apache.org/r1555107
[2] http://commons.apache.org/codec


>
> To Gary:
>
> It has two versions (source version and the generated version checked in),
> but there's no reason either should be shown so prominently, if at all.
>
> Hen
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > But the site is versioned, in SVN and as a reflection of the SVN/release
> > of the code base.
> >
> > G
> >
> > -------- Original message --------
> > From: Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org>
> > Date:01/03/2014  08:12  (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [LANG] Snap-shot version in website header
> >
> > 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Yes we change the site between releases.
> > >
> > > The bigger question is why we have a version number on the website, it
> > > isn't versioned.
> > >
> >
> > Well at least the repots have kind of a version, because they reflect the
> > state of the code they were build against.
> > And to me the reports for the latest release are far more important then
> > those for the current trunk.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Duncan Jones <duncan@wortharead.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > The top of the commons-lang web page reads:
> > > >
> > > > "Last Published: 01 January 2014  | Version: 3.3-SNAPSHOT "
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't that read:
> > > >
> > > > "Last Published: 01 January 2014  | Version: 3.2 " ??
> > > >
> > > > Or are we changing the site between releases, thus necessitating that
> > > > we build a site using the current (snapshot) version number?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Duncan
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> > http://github.com/britter
> >
>



-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message