Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C6E2100AF for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85658 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2013 11:11:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 85553 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2013 11:11:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 85545 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2013 11:11:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:11:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [178.254.33.213] (HELO samaflost.de) (178.254.33.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:11:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by samaflost.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201B2588C8DF for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:11:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from samaflost.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (v35516.1blu.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PH4MKQttKHCP for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:11:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by samaflost.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7BB67588C6AF; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:11:11 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan Bodewig To: "Commons Developers List" Subject: Re: [cli] Moving to Git? References: <52921AD5.5080108@apache.org> <52946156.60902@apache.org> <5294A65D.8030908@apache.org> <5295C39F.1000107@spaceroots.org> <87zjoqf8ze.fsf@v35516.1blu.de> <1a56b24cdda433f3b5ed383e5e987acf@scarlet.be> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:11:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1a56b24cdda433f3b5ed383e5e987acf@scarlet.be> (gilles@harfang.homelinux.org's message of "Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:46:30 +0100") Message-ID: <87vbzef6b4.fsf@v35516.1blu.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2013-11-27, Gilles wrote: >> So can we please allow the folks who actively work on [cli] today >> make the decsision which vcs they want to use? > Do "we" really have to allow them? Or do they have the right to do as > they please? "allow" was meant to be "let" rather than "permit" - my internal German to English translator picked the wrong meaning of "machen lassen" when it created the sentence :-) Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org