Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B57610F84 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 17:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27331 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2013 17:21:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 27242 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2013 17:21:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 27234 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2013 17:21:02 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:21:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.23.9]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username markt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:21:01 +0000 Message-ID: <527685FB.4080206@apache.org> Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:20:59 +0000 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC2 as 2.0 References: <5272710B.4070004@apache.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/11/2013 16:56, Gary Gregory wrote: > BTW, why are we not using Java 6's LinkedBlockingDeque instead of our > custom LinkedBlockingDeque? http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1175092 Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org