commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [CHALLENGE] Move All of Commons to the Dormant
Date Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:36:30 GMT
2013/10/15 Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com>

> I contend that all of the Commons components are inactive and should move
> to the Attic/Dormant. In line with Phil's recent suggestion that anyone can
> present a dormancy challenge at any time, I'm challenging all of Commons
> Proper.
>
> I've made a file in SVN:
>
>     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/trunks-proper/CHALLENGE.txt
>
> If committers could put their ids next to components they actively monitor
> the commits, JIRA, mailing list for, then we can determine, by elimination,
> the components that should be considered for dormancy.
>
> I propose we review the state of the file at the start of November :)
>
> Hen
>


Well, it's end of November now. So it's time to review the result of this
challenge...

Components with no active or interested maintainers:
- attributes
- betwixt
- bsf
- dbutils
- digester
- discovery
- el
- exec
- jci
- launcher
- modeler
- validator

Components with only one or only partially interested maintainer(s)

bcel=markt[partial],sebb[partial]
chain=britter
cli=ebourg
daemon=sebb[partial]
email=tn
fileupload=markt[partial]
jcs=tv
logging=rwhitcomb*,[tn]
net=sebb,[tn]
ognl=grobmeier
primitives=[tn]
proxy=mbenson
weaver=mbenson


Comments? thoughts?

Benedikt



-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message