commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christian Grobmeier" <grobme...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [cli] Moving to Git?
Date Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:46:47 GMT
On 29 Nov 2013, at 14:39, Torsten Curdt wrote:

>>
>> This in fact means:
>>>>
>>>> create a master branch which is stable.
>>>> create a develop branch which is not so stable.
>>>> create feature branches from develop where you work out your 
>>>> changes.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We are just swapping the branch names here, in the end your model 
>>> isn't
>>> very different from mine. Let's say the develop branch is named
>>> 'master', the stable branch is named '1.x' or 'stable' and we are
>>> basically dealing with the same workflow.
>>>
>>
>> It's not my model, its the model described here:
>> http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
>>
>> This is a model many people follow. Having a development branch which 
>> is
>> called master
>> will confuse a lot of people.
>
>
> I highly doubt that. In fact master being unstable is kind of the 
> default
> if you look around on github.
>
>
>
>> We should respect the naming conventions of git as good as possible.
>>
>
> There are *many* project that use git that have the master being 
> unstable.
> Rails is just one example.

Aha ok, good to know. Well you are more into that. I have learned it a 
different
way but well, I stand corrected.

> Please lets not mix one bike shedding topic with the other - that's 
> madness
> ;)

"I am not mad!"
- Nyarlathotep, the mad faceless god from Lovecrafts Cthulhu mythos
;-)


Cheers
Christian

>
> cheers,
> Torsten


---
http://www.grobmeier.de
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message