commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [lang] LANG-781
Date Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:29:40 GMT
I don't think any duplication will occur if we follow simple rules. Unless
the object performs validation -- which can determined if an exception is
thrown on validation failure -- then you have a method for ObjectUtils;
otherwise it belongs in Validate.


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 17, 2013 3:22 AM, "Henri Yandell" <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Matt/Gary:
> > >
> > > Are we able to move onwards with this issue?
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-781
> > >
> > > You seemed in agreement. Are the ObjectUtils patches good to apply, and
> > > does the Validate patch need implementing? Should the validate part be
> > > split off as a separate issue?
> > >
> >
> > Original requestor wants a boolean so I guess the ObjectUtils patch is
> > necessary to satisfy. If we split off the Validate issue then it doesn't
> so
> > much matter when that gets done though I believe it's trivial.
> >
>
> What I would like to see is:
> - Validate stand on it's own as a validation too.
> - ObjectUtils be a home for things we think belong in java.lang.Object or
> Objects.
>
> This means some duplication is possible.
>
> Gary
>
>
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > > Hen
> >
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>



-- 
Cheers,
Paul

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message