Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AF9E106AE for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 18:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41051 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2013 18:13:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 40622 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2013 18:13:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 40610 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2013 18:13:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 18:13:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gudnabrsam@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.180] (HELO mail-ea0-f180.google.com) (209.85.215.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 18:13:50 +0000 Received: by mail-ea0-f180.google.com with SMTP id r16so2154324ead.25 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:13:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=26C41AhQ7yauJOtgBQ5xuH7oKFo2A/CzNfC3n113h9Q=; b=y+x0nkS/VTgdLylaDzjRj4Sp0kEknT8IhkTR59+4XQvtN8son41XnemE2DD/tHRrEm WVJRur27Tlpvnj9K8JFrEtn3R6AAeTo76raREPBEvESKqcHDXtErc6zEYaow4BA1XwDP yMbTSmqSPkGc8gGA4oOJoHf4cbzWkMSPMxhgaSwZIL8Y2bP5sTBDGoy7qlnA/jgJ3za+ YzwKGmFCDOX1Pft1dkYBANPoY34DV8X2jzA6DCq2qJtoijXtpz8MAtrTM/q5rsaWEGVy ES+g74rTMK1IaN5U3sSPd8/39yUFFwu3B43tokhAC0/YyVmQGJJw15R9oJ2H6lAzq73I YldA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.14.223.199 with SMTP id v47mr52565799eep.32.1374948808638; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:13:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.132.137 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:13:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.132.137 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:13:28 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: gudnabrsam@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 13:13:28 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [proxy] and impl From: Matt Benson To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6704cd52e62304e282379a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b6704cd52e62304e282379a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable AFAIK Mark Struberg's work on the OWB proxies could be instructive, and since I've just spent several weeks in ASM hell I might just be a bit of use there myself. The only thing is, isn't cglib built on ASM as well? The dynamic nature of the various proxy helpers means that we probably couldn't really improve on cglib, i.e. only if we could test invocation matching up front while creating the proxy class would we be faster. Matt On Jul 27, 2013 12:22 PM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" wrote: > Hehe, we benched in owb but lets wait the porting ;) > Le 27 juil. 2013 16:49, "James Carman" a > =E9crit : > > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote: > > > Once ill have done the monitoring stuff ill try to work on it. > > > > What would be really cool is to have a "smackdown" once we get ASM > > into the mix to see which one performs the best and exactly how fast > > they are compared to one another. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > > > > --047d7b6704cd52e62304e282379a--