Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.128.181 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACLE=7Pj1KRfryOQXUOzN+9xbQ+YKjZAP+dO8RyYq4VFJQEaZg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CACLE=7MWbps+3JBkNLfzD5PR2YaVFfX21wtnn-VmY=6zJnL4pg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALznzY7jWoJ-KAaA4W3PSWOwrW=_w5uAVFi9U5=GJ12Q48ob=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACLE=7MVU1G8SwnEPVrYOz0NMBSZ66AckpF3zQ2fpxWiXb21BA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALznzY7ci4XBNFsO6saErjU3_f=s1P+6436GXyeVE+Yyyg0b9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACLE=7NkYPpeftSKqK2U1=r=Uu7M7cm6K52E3mkA8Z-O5M+JTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE9L6G3usuEoX4yYo8OKdaB=8cyNJko1v4c8nKuw88OXnCNrjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACLE=7Pj1KRfryOQXUOzN+9xbQ+YKjZAP+dO8RyYq4VFJQEaZg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 17:58:10 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CACLE=7Pg8-7XA202qBY1agjJDrOZZHEtu1ngA8RyFGDOuLEXLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [proxy] and impl
To: gudnabrsam@gmail.com, Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c5b7e8a637704e29472eb

--089e013c5b7e8a637704e29472eb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi

here is a patch implementing proxying using ASM:
https://gist.github.com/rmannibucau/6099063

having the handlers used by default in ProxyFactory protected would avoid
to copy them in ASMProxyFactory.

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.co=
m/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*


2013/7/28 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>

> Cglib is "almost" dead if i'm right, javassist is alive but not that
> stable and owb is faster ATM and at least would bring an Apache impl
> adapted to [proxy].
>
> Note: the fact to be able to reuse InvocationHandler and not a new API is
> great too
> Le 27 juil. 2013 20:13, "Matt Benson" <gudnabrsam@gmail.com> a =E9crit :
>
> AFAIK Mark Struberg's work on the OWB proxies could be instructive, and
>> since I've just spent several weeks in ASM hell I might just be a bit of
>> use there myself. The only thing is, isn't cglib built on ASM as well? T=
he
>> dynamic nature of the various proxy helpers means that we probably
>> couldn't
>> really improve on cglib, i.e. only if we could test invocation matching =
up
>> front while creating the proxy class would we be faster.
>>
>> Matt
>> On Jul 27, 2013 12:22 PM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hehe, we benched in owb but lets wait the porting ;)
>> > Le 27 juil. 2013 16:49, "James Carman" <james@carmanconsulting.com> a
>> > =E9crit :
>> >
>> > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > <rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > Once ill have done the monitoring stuff ill try to work on it.
>> > >
>> > > What would be really cool is to have a "smackdown" once we get ASM
>> > > into the mix to see which one performs the best and exactly how fast
>> > > they are compared to one another.
>> > >
>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

--089e013c5b7e8a637704e29472eb--