Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-143173-apmail-commons-dev-archive=commons.apache.org@commons.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 405ADD455
	for <apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed, 15 May 2013 12:37:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 16090 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2013 12:37:10 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 15695 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2013 12:37:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@commons.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@commons.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.commons.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org
Received: (qmail 15648 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2013 12:37:07 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 May 2013 12:37:07 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of garydgregory@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.45 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.214.45] (HELO mail-bk0-f45.google.com) (209.85.214.45)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 May 2013 12:37:01 +0000
Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id je9so974924bkc.18
        for <dev@commons.apache.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 05:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:references:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:date:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type;
        bh=2gRK79/6menyyhhpN0sMSiTvHGExsy04YNmIb9+K74I=;
        b=uOywi3LyBzVUOUFnI4p1LzHxhvoew6CCFtfQ/1HE64c0+YNXB3Zr9x/fTDCgDDxDRK
         1wtWC/c6OHkn++GN818J4R/fc4GQE+XvzDDU8hW/kcA1Ve+BIlBARb2le/6/q/CsuO6t
         R+mhG1TDqMvXwbkSwE7Jjr+/vZweIUVagb29j5zIZL+YNEDum+4qfSFS2PqS/r+jFyLw
         BzIStlhHjxS9aPvqC8aH53HE5jFduXlrGPhzic6jekzWJHfjj0P6OJybvrTbL1JNqTRC
         sYrYK5dkHGDNzfQs+dnVXHXD6wTzuJ7iW0gcv1kff/4R0D3J2FMtl9WU6Ob2UmzmPLWX
         LAZg==
X-Received: by 10.205.46.131 with SMTP id uo3mr10170246bkb.43.1368621400827;
 Wed, 15 May 2013 05:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
References: 
 <CAOGo0VZfw2Aq=MV0+fCQDqTwJNd3+dgNWDtVBE46OB+dZcmabQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJSjvwtm4aOdO15e41JR1VTcecbMm7KumQ+fEJ22w=LdU=FVrA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJSjvwtm4aOdO15e41JR1VTcecbMm7KumQ+fEJ22w=LdU=FVrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 08:36:39 -0400
Message-ID: <2721539267344862907@unknownmsgid>
Subject: Re: [ALL] RAT 0.9 slowness
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Can we do this in the pare t POM?

Gary

On May 15, 2013, at 4:03, Thomas Neidhart <thomas.neidhart@gmail.com> wrote:

> in collections I already filter it like this:
>
> <reporting>
>  <plugins>
>      <plugin>
>        <groupId>org.apache.rat</groupId>
>        <artifactId>apache-rat-plugin</artifactId>
>        <configuration>
>          <excludes>
>            <exclude>site-content/**/*</exclude>
>          </excludes>
>        </configuration>
>      </plugin>
>  ...
> </reporting>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:19 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've just done a test with IO, and the speed problem seems to be
>> related to the SVN files under site-content.
>> These seem to cause 0.9 to hang - a thread dump shows the code is
>> mainly at the line:
>>
>> at
>> org.apache.rat.analysis.license.FullTextMatchingLicense.match(FullTextMatchingLicense.java:79)
>>
>> This is calling Pattern.matcher() so I assume there must be some kind
>> of content that causes the regex engine to churn.
>> Perhaps the pattern is causing excess backtracking.
>>
>> I've no idea why 0.9 has a problem with these particular files, but
>> they should not be included in the RAT check anyway.
>>
>> If you want to test RAT on its own:
>>
>> mvn apache-rat:rat [-Dcommons.rat.version=0.9]
>>
>> Obviously there is a bug in RAT 0.9, but maybe we can avoid it by
>> excluding site-content.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org