commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Bourg <>
Subject Re: [parent][all] JaCoCo vs. Cobertura
Date Wed, 22 May 2013 16:58:08 GMT
Le 22/05/2013 18:52, Gary Gregory a écrit :

> The problem is that Jacoco produces bogus results as I recently emailed
> about the [io] component. The large portion of the code is reported with 0%
> coverage which is completely wrong. This is apparently a known issue due to
> the Jacoco use of 'probes' to analyze code which is not compatible with the
> use of exceptions.

What do you mean by probe? It doesn't instrument the code?

Emmanuel Bourg

View raw message