Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0F23F2EE for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 20:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3565 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2013 20:13:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 3456 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2013 20:13:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 3447 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2013 20:13:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:13:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.169] (HELO mail-wi0-f169.google.com) (209.85.212.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:12:56 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c10so1149228wiw.4 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:12:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ttEps67rITXsgS4x3I6QZnucsCH+TgrOfqGhOELOM7k=; b=af8iIlc6kJ05mAjgCRsbTwiRHbEu+T26uxGmfzwbJzoVTAT3jDn4m8eUDARsfKXXvD 2MtGBzKaT3+GvVhuweWc0hCslyvHmB04jEZyolK93HkKsssHMX7PSrg50gdr/i3xrWBT z5DvawOvsNh7KxXG1Id2dI0mp8UeYKOuG5s6JtrxtNdBqXvFy7wlH3J+dCEDX54cMSjD COHqA2HH0glYY8hB6ARpLv6HaKFrEQZ4C2k1JVmmy0uRMrHFaf4FEYp2DRsllbCICIBK NAPApq7M0YVgw2ZU8Bcc0MskdSWKY5HB/cnPtNFrWEu3VOZeDQTJvl8JyvbaPBjt9KzO jBkg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.74.67 with SMTP id r3mr31422456wiv.14.1365106356545; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:12:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.243.10 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 13:12:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <515DD2FC.1000607@apache.org> <515DD775.1020409@apache.org> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 21:12:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [codec][lang] LetterCase proposal From: sebb To: Commons Developers List , gudnabrsam@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0438914d766ec204d98e971b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0438914d766ec204d98e971b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4 April 2013 20:46, Matt Benson wrote: > In this case I wouldn't consider the duplication to be that big a deal. > +1 The enum is two-state only; the duplication is tiny. > Matt > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > > Le 04/04/2013 21:28, Matt Benson a =E9crit : > > > I rather thought Gary was suggesting to duplicate the enum in both > libs. > > > > Hum, a dependency or a duplication then? Rope or guillotine? :) > > > > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > > > > --f46d0438914d766ec204d98e971b--