Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of phil.steitz@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.192.174 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <515F1735.5060602@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:25:57 -0700
From: Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Math 3.2 - RC5
References: <515B45B9.7010906@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <515B45B9.7010906@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+1

Phil

On 4/2/13 1:55 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.2, based on release
> candidate 5.
>
> This version fixes numerous bugs and adds a few features.
>
> You can retrieve the various parts here:
>
> Sources, binaries and release notes:
>
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/> (svn revision 1728)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-053/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.2/>
>
> Details of changes since 3.1.1 are in the release notes:
>
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/RELEASE-NOTES.txt>
>
> <http://people.apache.org/~luc/commons-math-3.2-RC5-site/changes-report.html>
> (will be available only tomorrow morning European time)
>
> Tag:
>
> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_2_RC5/>
> (svn revision 1463704)
>
> Site (will be available only tomorrow morning European time):
>
> <http://people.apache.org/~luc/commons-math-3.2-RC5-site/>
>
> All reports (CLIRR, RAT, findbugs ...) :
>
> <http://people.apache.org/~luc/commons-math-3.2-RC5-site/project-reports.html>
>  (will be available only tomorrow morning European time)
>
> Note that the PMD report shows several violations. A few of them are
> false positive (unused method, unused field). A number of them are
> voluntary (overriding method that simply calls super) because what we
> really need in these cases is to add specific javadoc in the overriding
> method. The remaining errors correspond to unused parameters. They are
> known and correspond to deprecated method that will be removed in 4.0.
> So despite the report is not perfectly clean, in fact everything that
> could be fixed in it has already been fixed.
>
> Votes, please.
> This vote will close in 72 hours: 2013-04-05T21:00:00 UTC
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>   Thanks!
>
> Luc
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org