Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C066FDA40 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 16:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33981 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2013 16:58:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 33556 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2013 16:58:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 33536 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2013 16:58:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:58:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.50] (HELO mail-wg0-f50.google.com) (74.125.82.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:58:34 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id es5so6158987wgb.29 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 08:58:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uNczIuxTYEfJ4hhJ2Gs24AMH+XRjl9l9TFolieweACg=; b=CxMQ1UI3xq6w7Zsg7+h2HkR6+O6Zc3v+qtdg0iiFVUsJ6OerlqHl1/Sy05vyZTl5hv KO5hPCew+GrbBBSCYqrsJ2I8uefuMwcyq+VMoxoFgKyq4zDBk7F4O/jJonYJUXHhRxas CLpExfgnxvGl62iNDmf42hwN4Wj69CErBm85V7irDgHp0OdjEYLGU9k1NLCYE1Qcya2C zbCERI8HiDI58r+nZW9SBpNn3JPivQsP0io5aQRAdQpXNcAqs180osQ8cSuQHXFBfkKv Gg7YcdDYItC3FR20KND+NLeTOWVHEeyW7E62f8HLWDtdBygIHKv3Vjs25PJo5mlgw1uX 6TJw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.78.168 with SMTP id c8mr11850676wix.27.1362502692038; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 08:58:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.61.236 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 08:58:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <-3353401536348119871@unknownmsgid> References: <-3353401536348119871@unknownmsgid> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 16:58:11 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [fileupload] drop JDK1.3 support, update to 1.5 and bump to 2.0.0 From: sebb To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5 March 2013 16:43, Gary Gregory wrote: > +1. Why not Java 6 since 5 is mostly dead. 1.5 is not totally dead, so why exclude those users who still have Java 1.5? If there is some feature of 1.6 that would make a big difference to the performance/functionality then it night be OK, but there is no point requiring Java 6 otherwise. > Gary > > On Mar 5, 2013, at 10:05, Simone Tripodi wrote: > >> Hi all guys, >> >> since I need [fileupload] @work, I intend to do a major bump that >> recently involved other commons component. >> >> Any objection? >> TIA, >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org