Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE941D166 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94544 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2013 12:35:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 93265 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2013 12:35:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 93226 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2013 12:35:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:35:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.181] (HELO mail-we0-f181.google.com) (74.125.82.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:35:29 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id t44so7855548wey.12 for ; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 04:35:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hN41X6UKJARkHTkyuLI5Vl/JOUgUntDJytDeKJzhFDk=; b=eqaswmBC1bgtwc2kto+t57OhKmMDIzAs7gIPHEV9CiBDyu4MpG9puXpD0caWCiibb7 d5qTj8yEU0pe8EAkPI22n+Nm0abcM3uOwVqnG9oOy6JAEuhzF5Yf90504FTwHHuMIDnP Rfb2Ul7Dz0K65KrNvxjEBflkXOEA31SIEhYDvqLTkA6JtVYi8pZCxHIFhWzQVPmHwglc lYOvZDb87SGrO3wxbm2r22dnLOEtiK5q5FHuKXb8Sqqhde1QJnZ//JMp0AQBVfQObtuR 8g0G/Kws5m3puKQJp8lY2MPgZE3DI5KMoMOL+ZUV35ZXa3N461n5umMKiyaJgeKc9dwC Lw4Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.82.33 with SMTP id f1mr25533089wiy.13.1362573307705; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 04:35:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.61.236 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 04:35:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:35:07 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BeanUtils] Update to Java 1.5 for next release? From: sebb To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6 March 2013 11:32, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > I have recently learned that changing the required Java version for a > component does not necessarily affect binary compartibility [1]. > I'm thinking about updating [BeanUtils] to Java 1.5. We would have the > following advantages: > > - concurrency facilities in java.util.concurrent (could be useful for the > internal caching) > - generics > - JUnit 4 > > WDYT? +1 > Benedikt > > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/mgsjqib5iyyaicgg > -- > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > http://github.com/britter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org