Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of thomas.neidhart@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.45 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <51530B9F.8050905@gmail.com>
References: <51349281.6030705@spaceroots.org>
	<82edd953fa208d41223a7fb467273ded@scarlet.be>
	<514DCA93.3060402@gmail.com>
	<515072C2.1030403@free.fr>
	<51521B48.6010705@gmail.com>
	<515299AA.7040505@gmail.com>
	<51530B9F.8050905@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:13:14 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAJSjvwv8DEF3Lm5T9o+umCa-vzu_5ZRaEwsoFD-YEAcB4s1O4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [math] releasing 3.2?
From: Thomas Neidhart <thomas.neidhart@gmail.com>
To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc19c01c588604d8e97ae5

--047d7bdc19c01c588604d8e97ae5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/27/13 12:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a =E9crit :
> >>>> On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote:
> >>>>> Hello.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
> >>>>>> Any thoughts about it?
> >>>>> How soon?
> >>>>> There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
> >>>>> There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936).
> >>>>> There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback
> (MATH-917).
> >>>> I have added a first patch and would love to get some feedback.
> >>> It seems we are really close to releasing now. I guess MATH-817 will =
be
> >>> resolved soon. What seems to be achievable in a short time frame woul=
d
> be:
> >>>
> >>>   - wrapping up MATH-917 as Thomas proposed,
> >>>   - finishing MATH-437 (Kolmogorov-Smirnov), and perhaps also
> >>>     MATH-228 at the same time
> >> See comment just added to MATH-437.  I am working on it, but not
> >> ready to commit to API, so say bump this to 3.3/4.0.
> >>
> >> One thing I did not mention in the MATH-437 comment.  While I think
> >> we should not do it in the K-S case, because the dist itself has
> >> little value and much numeric instability, the approximation tricks
> >> in your patch are interesting and might merit inclusion in
> >> AbstractRealDistribution (which actually is where the impls belong).
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > can you maybe also take a look at MATH-981? I have already provided a
> > patch, but would like to hear your opinion on this as it is more a
> > work-around for the moment.
>
> Hmmm.  Can't find 981 and no permutation looks that interesting ;)
>

sorry, its MATH-891

Thomas

--047d7bdc19c01c588604d8e97ae5--