Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F5F1EF29 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69589 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2013 08:20:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 69216 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2013 08:20:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 69187 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2013 08:20:24 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:20:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-wi0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username britter, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:20:23 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l13so8747283wie.2 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:20:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.11.70 with SMTP id o6mr15906711wjb.39.1362126022132; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:20:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.7.42 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 00:20:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <512FC367.2040902@oliver-heger.de> References: <512FC367.2040902@oliver-heger.de> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:20:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BeanUtils] Next release 1.8.4 or 1.9? From: Benedikt Ritter To: Commons Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d456cb0498204d6d8ad88 --047d7b5d456cb0498204d6d8ad88 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Oliver, 2013/2/28 Oliver Heger > Hi, > > Am 28.02.2013 14:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > 2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix >>> release or start to work on new features right away and release a 1.9 >>> (including bug fixes of course ;-) >>> >>> Benedikt >>> >>> >> I have looked through a lot of issues in the meantime. There are currently >> at least 11 bugs that could be fixed in 1.8.4. So IMHO it makes sense to >> push out a 1.8.4 and start working on new features afterwards. >> I'd like to hear Olivers thoughts about this, as I think he needs new >> features for the next [configuration] release. >> > > I started working on a patch for BEANUTILS-425, so I hope to get this in > in near future. This is what I would need for a new [configuration] > release. However, before this can happen, there are lots of things to do. > So no need to hurry. > > Didn't know that you're already working on that. Can you assign the issue to yourself? > That said, I think it is a valid option to skip the maintenance release > and go directly to the feature release, even if this takes a little longer. > (The last release was long ago, so a few weeks/months do not make a > difference.) > > But if you have free time available and want to go ahead, just do it. > No, you're probably right, a few month more make no difference and I'd really like to work on BEANUTILS-406 [1]. I don't know which impact the decision to do a 1.9 next has on Jira (fix versions etc.). Can you do the necessary changes? Benedikt [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-406 > > Oliver > > > >> Benedikt >> >> >> >>> -- >>> http://people.apache.org/~**britter/ >>> http://www.systemoutprintln.**de/ >>> http://twitter.com/**BenediktRitter >>> http://github.com/britter >>> >>> >> >> >> > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter --047d7b5d456cb0498204d6d8ad88--